Yevhen Leheza
Dnipro Humanitarian University, Ukraine

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Interpretation of Regulatory and Legal Acts in Contemporary Contexts: Foreign Experience, Comparative Perspectives, and Pathways for Regulatory Reform Yevhen Leheza; Oleksandr Kurakin; Olha Shapovalova; Kateryna Sokh; Artur Makarov
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18727992

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical and legal foundations of interpreting regulatory and legal acts in contemporary contexts, with particular emphasis on integrating foreign experience into the Ukrainian legal system. The study aims to identify methodological gaps in domestic interpretative practice and to formulate pathways for regulatory reform aligned with European standards. Employing a comparative legal methodology, the research analyses interpretative approaches across continental systems (Germany and France) and Anglo-Saxon systems (Great Britain and the United States), as well as the jurisprudence of supranational judicial institutions, notably the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis combines doctrinal examination, case-law review, and systemic legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that the continental tradition ensures coherence, systematicity, and legal certainty, whereas the precedent-based model emphasises flexibility, judicial creativity, and practical justice. In contrast, interpretative practice in Ukraine remains predominantly formalistic, lacks methodological integration, and is insufficiently responsive to the dynamics of European integration. The study substantiates the feasibility of combining domestic legal traditions with advanced European interpretative methods, particularly teleological, systemic, and evolutionary approaches oriented toward the rule of law and human rights protection. It further argues for strengthening the Supreme Court's role in ensuring uniform judicial practice and fostering doctrinal development. The article contributes to comparative legal scholarship by proposing a structured model of interpretative reform that bridges continental and precedent-based traditions. Its practical significance lies in enhancing the quality of law enforcement, promoting harmonisation with European legal standards, and fostering a modern culture of legal interpretation responsive to contemporary regulatory challenges.
Education as a Strategic Instrument for Human Rights Protection: Innovations and European Best Practices Yevhen Leheza; Nataliia Zadyraka; Yuliia Leheza
Nusantara Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Nusantara Education
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaraeducation.v5i2.263

Abstract

Education has increasingly become a strategic instrument for promoting, implementing, and safeguarding human rights amid rapid social transformation and democratic development. However, despite ongoing educational reforms, human rights education in Ukraine remains fragmented and insufficiently aligned with European standards, limiting its contribution to fostering legal awareness and democratic citizenship. This study aims to examine the role of education in ensuring human rights, analyze the implementation of human rights education across selected European Union countries, identify transferable best practices, and formulate policy recommendations to strengthen Ukraine's educational framework in line with European standards. This research employed a qualitative field research design using a comparative legal approach. Empirical data were collected through semi-structured interviews with educators, legal scholars, policymakers, and curriculum developers in Ukraine, complemented by field observations of educational institutions and document analysis of national legislation, educational policies, and European normative frameworks. The findings reveal that Germany, France, Finland, and Poland have institutionalized human rights education as an integral component of compulsory civic education through interdisciplinary curricula, participatory learning methods, teacher professional development, and digital educational resources. By contrast, Ukraine continues to implement human rights education inconsistently across educational levels, resulting in uneven legal literacy and civic competence. The study further demonstrates that adapting European educational practices requires contextualization within Ukraine's legal, institutional, and socio-cultural environment, supported by curriculum reform, teacher capacity building, digital innovation, and strengthened cooperation with European and international organizations. The originality of this research lies in integrating empirical field evidence with comparative legal analysis to develop a comprehensive framework for reforming human rights education in Ukraine. These findings advance legal education scholarship and provide practical guidance for policymakers, educational institutions, and curriculum developers seeking to modernize national education systems while reinforcing democratic values and sustainable human rights protection.
Reforming the Legal Framework of Ukraine's Economic System: Challenges, Governance, and Regulatory Transformation Yevhen Leheza
Journal of Nusantara Economy Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Journal Of Nusantara Economy
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaraeconomy.v5i1.399

Abstract

This study examines the reform of Ukraine’s tax law framework as a strategic component of economic modernization in the context of European integration, digital governance, and post-war reconstruction. It aims to evaluate the extent to which existing legal and institutional arrangements support regulatory effectiveness, legal certainty, fiscal sustainability, and financial security while aligning national tax legislation with European Union standards, OECD principles, and international regulatory frameworks. The research employs a qualitative field research design using semi-structured interviews with government officials, tax administrators, legal practitioners, business representatives, and academic experts. Data collection is complemented by direct observation and documentary analysis of tax legislation, administrative regulations, judicial decisions, strategic policy documents, and official institutional reports. Data are analyzed through thematic analysis, supported by statutory interpretation, comparative legal analysis, and source triangulation to ensure analytical validity, consistency, and credibility. The findings indicate that Ukraine’s tax regulatory system continues to face substantial structural challenges, including legislative instability, fragmented institutional coordination, administrative inefficiency, limited accountability, and partial inconsistencies with European Union legal standards. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates significant progress through the digital transformation of tax administration, procedural simplification, greater regulatory transparency, improved taxpayer services, and gradual harmonization with European Commission recommendations and OECD tax governance principles. The analysis further reveals that sustainable tax reform requires an integrated governance model founded on legal certainty, adaptive legislation, digital public administration, risk-based tax supervision, institutional resilience, and collaborative governance involving public authorities, private stakeholders, and international partners. The study contributes to comparative economic law by developing an integrated legal framework that connects tax law reform, digital governance, fiscal security, and European regulatory convergence as mutually reinforcing pillars of economic modernization. The proposed framework enriches contemporary scholarship on tax governance while offering practical policy guidance for strengthening Ukraine’s legal institutions, enhancing investor confidence, improving fiscal resilience, and supporting sustainable economic recovery within the evolving European legal and economic order.