Brian Wasita
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret/Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Discordance Between Plasma and Intratumoral Estradiol in Treatment-Naïve Luminal Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Arga Scorpianus Renardi; Widyanti Soewoto; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i8.1643

Abstract

Background: Estradiol drives luminal breast cancer, and plasma estradiol is widely used as a systemic marker; whether it reflects the intratumoral hormonal milieu is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between plasma and intratumoral estradiol and their demographic determinants in treatment-naive luminal breast cancer. Methods: An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital and the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia (2019-2024). Fifty-six treatment-naive patients with Luminal A or Luminal B breast cancer were enrolled by total sampling. Plasma estradiol was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and intratumoral estradiol by immunohistochemistry; data were analysed with Spearman correlation, chi-square/Fisher tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis, with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Plasma estradiol did not correlate with intratumoral estradiol (Spearman rho = 0.136; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.39; p = 0.319) and discriminated tissue positivity at chance level (AUC = 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.59). Age >=50 years (OR 7.27; 95% CI 2.01-26.29; p = 0.001) and postmenopausal status (OR 11.61; 95% CI 2.85-47.38; p < 0.001) were associated with high plasma estradiol, and postmenopausal status remained independent after adjustment (adjusted OR 11.16; 95% CI 2.68-46.54). Neither variable was associated with intratumoral estradiol (p = 0.863 and p = 0.665). Conclusion: Systemic estradiol does not represent the tumour hormonal state in luminal breast cancer; intratumoral estrogen appears governed by local intracrine mechanisms. Tumour-specific assessment may guide endocrine therapy more accurately than plasma measurement alone.
Discordance Between Plasma and Intratumoral Estradiol in Treatment-Naïve Luminal Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Arga Scorpianus Renardi; Widyanti Soewoto; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i8.1643

Abstract

Background: Estradiol drives luminal breast cancer, and plasma estradiol is widely used as a systemic marker; whether it reflects the intratumoral hormonal milieu is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between plasma and intratumoral estradiol and their demographic determinants in treatment-naive luminal breast cancer. Methods: An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital and the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia (2019-2024). Fifty-six treatment-naive patients with Luminal A or Luminal B breast cancer were enrolled by total sampling. Plasma estradiol was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and intratumoral estradiol by immunohistochemistry; data were analysed with Spearman correlation, chi-square/Fisher tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis, with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Plasma estradiol did not correlate with intratumoral estradiol (Spearman rho = 0.136; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.39; p = 0.319) and discriminated tissue positivity at chance level (AUC = 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.59). Age >=50 years (OR 7.27; 95% CI 2.01-26.29; p = 0.001) and postmenopausal status (OR 11.61; 95% CI 2.85-47.38; p < 0.001) were associated with high plasma estradiol, and postmenopausal status remained independent after adjustment (adjusted OR 11.16; 95% CI 2.68-46.54). Neither variable was associated with intratumoral estradiol (p = 0.863 and p = 0.665). Conclusion: Systemic estradiol does not represent the tumour hormonal state in luminal breast cancer; intratumoral estrogen appears governed by local intracrine mechanisms. Tumour-specific assessment may guide endocrine therapy more accurately than plasma measurement alone.
Thresholds of Cytoprotection: Ethanolic Propolis Extract Mitigates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via the MDA/IL-6 Axis in a Graded Rat Skin Flap Model Dinar Kukuh Prasetyo; Amru Sungkar; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i3.1546

Abstract

Background: Distal necrosis in reconstructive skin flaps results from ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines. While Propolis exhibits antioxidant properties, its efficacy limit relative to the severity of ischemic challenge remains undefined. Methods: A randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted using 36 male Wistar rats. A graded ischemia model was engineered using modified McFarlane flaps with increasing length-to-width ratios: Mild (2:1), moderate (3:1), and severe (4:1). Subjects were stratified into vehicle (Control) and treatment (Propolis 800 mg/kg/day, oral) groups across all dimensions. The primary endpoint was the percentage of viable flap area on Day 7. Secondary endpoints included serum Malondialdehyde (MDA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and histological scoring of inflammation. Results: All animals survived the procedure. Propolis significantly increased viable tissue area in the moderate ischemia group (76.4 ± 4.2%) compared to Vehicle (52.1 ± 5.8%; p < 0.001). In Mild ischemia, survival was near-maximal in both groups (>92%). However, in Severe ischemia, Propolis failed to prevent significant necrosis (34.2 ± 6.1% survival vs. 28.5 ± 5.4% in Vehicle; p = 0.092), indicating a therapeutic ceiling. Biochemically, Propolis suppressed MDA (11.92 ± 0.45 nmol/mL) and IL-6 (121.0 ± 4.71 pg/mL) significantly in moderate challenges but was overwhelmed by the oxidative surge in severe ischemia (MDA > 12.0 nmol/mL). Conclusion: Propolis confers significant protection against I/R injury by dampening lipid peroxidation and systemic inflammation, but this effect exhibits a distinct threshold. It is highly effective in moderate ischemic challenges but insufficient for severe vascular compromise.
Discordance Between Plasma and Intratumoral Estradiol in Treatment-Naïve Luminal Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Arga Scorpianus Renardi; Widyanti Soewoto; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i8.1643

Abstract

Background: Estradiol drives luminal breast cancer, and plasma estradiol is widely used as a systemic marker; whether it reflects the intratumoral hormonal milieu is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between plasma and intratumoral estradiol and their demographic determinants in treatment-naive luminal breast cancer. Methods: An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital and the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia (2019-2024). Fifty-six treatment-naive patients with Luminal A or Luminal B breast cancer were enrolled by total sampling. Plasma estradiol was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and intratumoral estradiol by immunohistochemistry; data were analysed with Spearman correlation, chi-square/Fisher tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis, with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Plasma estradiol did not correlate with intratumoral estradiol (Spearman rho = 0.136; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.39; p = 0.319) and discriminated tissue positivity at chance level (AUC = 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.59). Age >=50 years (OR 7.27; 95% CI 2.01-26.29; p = 0.001) and postmenopausal status (OR 11.61; 95% CI 2.85-47.38; p < 0.001) were associated with high plasma estradiol, and postmenopausal status remained independent after adjustment (adjusted OR 11.16; 95% CI 2.68-46.54). Neither variable was associated with intratumoral estradiol (p = 0.863 and p = 0.665). Conclusion: Systemic estradiol does not represent the tumour hormonal state in luminal breast cancer; intratumoral estrogen appears governed by local intracrine mechanisms. Tumour-specific assessment may guide endocrine therapy more accurately than plasma measurement alone.
Thresholds of Cytoprotection: Ethanolic Propolis Extract Mitigates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via the MDA/IL-6 Axis in a Graded Rat Skin Flap Model Dinar Kukuh Prasetyo; Amru Sungkar; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i3.1546

Abstract

Background: Distal necrosis in reconstructive skin flaps results from ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines. While Propolis exhibits antioxidant properties, its efficacy limit relative to the severity of ischemic challenge remains undefined. Methods: A randomized, controlled experimental study was conducted using 36 male Wistar rats. A graded ischemia model was engineered using modified McFarlane flaps with increasing length-to-width ratios: Mild (2:1), moderate (3:1), and severe (4:1). Subjects were stratified into vehicle (Control) and treatment (Propolis 800 mg/kg/day, oral) groups across all dimensions. The primary endpoint was the percentage of viable flap area on Day 7. Secondary endpoints included serum Malondialdehyde (MDA), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and histological scoring of inflammation. Results: All animals survived the procedure. Propolis significantly increased viable tissue area in the moderate ischemia group (76.4 ± 4.2%) compared to Vehicle (52.1 ± 5.8%; p < 0.001). In Mild ischemia, survival was near-maximal in both groups (>92%). However, in Severe ischemia, Propolis failed to prevent significant necrosis (34.2 ± 6.1% survival vs. 28.5 ± 5.4% in Vehicle; p = 0.092), indicating a therapeutic ceiling. Biochemically, Propolis suppressed MDA (11.92 ± 0.45 nmol/mL) and IL-6 (121.0 ± 4.71 pg/mL) significantly in moderate challenges but was overwhelmed by the oxidative surge in severe ischemia (MDA > 12.0 nmol/mL). Conclusion: Propolis confers significant protection against I/R injury by dampening lipid peroxidation and systemic inflammation, but this effect exhibits a distinct threshold. It is highly effective in moderate ischemic challenges but insufficient for severe vascular compromise.
Discordance Between Plasma and Intratumoral Estradiol in Treatment-Naïve Luminal Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Arga Scorpianus Renardi; Widyanti Soewoto; Brian Wasita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i8.1643

Abstract

Background: Estradiol drives luminal breast cancer, and plasma estradiol is widely used as a systemic marker; whether it reflects the intratumoral hormonal milieu is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between plasma and intratumoral estradiol and their demographic determinants in treatment-naive luminal breast cancer. Methods: An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital and the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia (2019-2024). Fifty-six treatment-naive patients with Luminal A or Luminal B breast cancer were enrolled by total sampling. Plasma estradiol was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and intratumoral estradiol by immunohistochemistry; data were analysed with Spearman correlation, chi-square/Fisher tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis, with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Plasma estradiol did not correlate with intratumoral estradiol (Spearman rho = 0.136; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.39; p = 0.319) and discriminated tissue positivity at chance level (AUC = 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.59). Age >=50 years (OR 7.27; 95% CI 2.01-26.29; p = 0.001) and postmenopausal status (OR 11.61; 95% CI 2.85-47.38; p < 0.001) were associated with high plasma estradiol, and postmenopausal status remained independent after adjustment (adjusted OR 11.16; 95% CI 2.68-46.54). Neither variable was associated with intratumoral estradiol (p = 0.863 and p = 0.665). Conclusion: Systemic estradiol does not represent the tumour hormonal state in luminal breast cancer; intratumoral estrogen appears governed by local intracrine mechanisms. Tumour-specific assessment may guide endocrine therapy more accurately than plasma measurement alone.