M. Sihabudin
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Transformasi Nilai Ḥalāl–Ṭayyib dalam Tafsir Indonesia: Kajian Historis dan Kontemporer Rahma Nurul Latifah; M. Sihabudin
Jurnal test Vol 4 No 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.649

Abstract

The rapid globalization of the food industry and the rising awareness of Muslim consumers have profoundly reshaped the interpretation of the Qur’anic concepts of ḥalāl and ṭayyib in Indonesia. While classical exegesis confined their meanings to legal permissibility and physical cleanliness, contemporary interpretations view ḥalāl–ṭayyib as multidimensional principles encompassing nutrition, health, ethical production, and environmental sustainability. This study aims to explore the transformation of Qur’anic interpretations of ḥalāl and ṭayyib from the classical to the contemporary period within the Indonesian exegetical tradition. Employing a qualitative library research design, it applies thematic content analysis to three major works: Marāḥ Labīd by Nawawī al-Bantanī, Al-Azhar by Hamka, and Al-Mishbāḥ by Quraish Shihab. The findings reveal a paradigmatic shift from a normative–legal framework to a contextual approach that integrates social, health, and ecological dimensions. This transformation reinforces the maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah (objectives of Islamic law) in the domain of consumption and provides a philosophical foundation for contemporary ḥalāl certification policies and the development of Indonesia’s modern ḥalāl industry.
Analisis Kritis Kritik Al-Dzahabi terhadap Tafsir Al-Kasysyaf terhadap Q.S. an-Nisa’: 164 Rasya' Alfirdaus; Aliyya Qothrunnada AS; M. Sihabudin
Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : Islamic Religious Education Departement

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/JSQ.21.2.4

Abstract

The development of interpretation from era to era has given rise to sectarianism, absolutism, and blind fanaticism in interpretation. This is highly risky and has excellent potential to become a deviation in interpretation, thus giving rise to the study of critical interpretation. In this context, the Tafsir al-Kasysyaf, known for the intense subjectivity of its interpreter, is particularly susceptible to absolutism and blind fanaticism, which are closer to deviations in interpretation. Therefore, it is worthy of critical study. Al-Dzahabi, an expert in critical interpretation, outlines the critical research here. The object of study focuses on Q.S. al-Nisa' verse 164 because it discusses the nature of Allah's speech that the Mu'tazilah opposes, thus providing an overview of how the mufassir defends the theology he adheres to regarding this verse. Using library research and descriptive analysis methods, this research article aims to examine al-Dzahabi's criticism based on the focus of the study on the interpretation of Q.S. al-Nisa' verse 164 in al-Kasysyaf — whether it is included in al-dakhil or not, and about the forms of al-dakhil that contradict al-ashil. This study found that az-Zamakhsyari's interpretation of the verse is categorised as al-dakhil in the form of riwayat and raiso or ijtihad. Further research recommendations include expanding the analysis to other interpretations influenced by theological tendencies and developing a methodology of interpretation criticism as a scientific evaluation tool. This study encourages academics and exegesis practitioners to apply an objective, critical approach to maintain validity and avoid errors in understanding the Quran.