Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam
Putu Samawati
Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimising Telemedicine: Can it fulfil the right to healthcare in Indonesia? Helena Primadianti Sulistyaningrum; Putu Samawati
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 10 Issue 2, July 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v10i2.5722

Abstract

Telemedicine, an innovation in information technology-based healthcare services, has emerged as a solution to address the challenges of equitable and high-quality healthcare access. However, many challenges and obstacles still hinder the provision of telemedicine to the public. This study will examine two main points in addressing these challenges and obstacles: the sustainable benefits of telemedicine in fulfilling the right to health and the ideal legal reconstruction governing it. The legal issues analysed concern the lack of comprehensive regulations and the need for a clear legal framework to protect patient rights, ensure data security, and provide service certainty. The method employed is normative research, incorporating literature reviews and regulatory analysis, as well as ethical and legal concepts related to telemedicine. The analysis results indicate that telemedicine provides sustainable benefits through improved access to healthcare services, cost efficiency, and enhanced service quality and patient satisfaction, thereby fulfilling the right to health. However, without a strong legal foundation, telemedicine practices can pose significant legal risks, particularly regarding malpractice and data protection. Therefore, an ideal legal framework is needed to regulate aspects of the doctor-patient relationship, rights and obligations, data protection, and independent oversight mechanisms. Telemedicine is a solution and innovation that offers sustainable benefits in supporting the effective fulfilment of the right to health, provided it is accompanied by adequate legal protection to ensure justice, certainty, usefulness, safety, and quality in digital healthcare services.
Reconceptualizing CSR Grant Governance in Regional SOEs: Integrating Maqasid al-Shariah and SDG 17 Dita Kurniawati; Joni Emirzon; Putu Samawati; Saifudin Amin
Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 26 No. 03 (2025): Profetika Jurnal Studi Islam 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/profetika.v26i03.15889

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to reconceptualize grant arrangements by BUMDs in CSR programs through a beneficiality principle approach aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 17 on partnerships for sustainable development. The focus is on formulating recommendations for regulatory concepts that can be applied in the future. This goal is directed to increase legal certainty and the social impact of CSR programs. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework is based on the concept of regulating BUMD's CSR obligations based on the applicable legal basis while incorporating SDGs principles. The principle of the usefulness approach is used as the basis for the analysis of regulatory reconstruction, including the integration of the perspective of maqasid al-shari'ah and SDG 17. The framework emphasizes a balance between legal certainty, public benefit, sustainability, and collaborative governance. Literature review: The literature review covers social and environmental responsibility regulations and the concept of grants in BUMD CSR, including the need to reconstruct regulations so that they do not overlap with APBD grants, while supporting SDGs-oriented governance. Methods: The method used is normative juridical through the study of legal literature, laws, and regulations to analyze problems and formulate regulatory concepts in line with SDGs values. Results: The results show that there is no clear legal terminology for grants by BUMDs, so that it has the potential to cause inequality with APBD grants and needs to be based on the principle of sustainable utility and SDGs-oriented governance, particularly strengthening partnerships (SDG 17). Implications: This study emphasizes the importance of clear regulations to increase the accountability of BUMD CSR and ensure tangible social benefits for the community while contributing to the achievement of SDGs. Novelty: The novelty lies in the formulation of the CSR concept through BUMD grants based on the principles of usefulness, maqasid al-shari'ah, and SDGs (especially SDG 17), while still paying attention to legal certainty and sustainable development.
Co-Authors Dita Kurniawati Helena Primadianti Sulistyaningrum Joni Emirzon Saifudin Amin