Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy
Riski Ramadani, Andi Tri
Unknown Affiliation
Education Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Students’ Ability to Develop Critical Thinking Skills Assessment Instruments Using Discussion and Lecture-Based Learning Methods Arif, Rifda Nur Hikmahwati; Ramlawati; Sari, Nur Indah; Riski Ramadani, Andi Tri
International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March-April 2026
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/ijepp.v4i1.354

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are essential competencies in 21st-century education because they support students in analyzing information, evaluating arguments, and making reasoned decisions. In science education, these skills are important not only for understanding scientific concepts but also for solving complex problems and interpreting evidence. However, developing valid and reliable assessment instruments for measuring critical thinking remains a challenge, especially for pre-service teachers. This study aims to analyze the ability of Science Education students to develop critical thinking assessment instruments and to compare the effectiveness of three frameworks: Facione, Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA), and Ennis. The research employed a quantitative approach using a descriptive–comparative design involving 27 students enrolled in an assessment instrument development course. Data were collected through the evaluation of instruments developed by students using a validated rubric and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The results indicate that students demonstrated good ability in developing critical thinking assessment instruments. The average scores were 70.45 for Facione, 82 for WGCTA, and 78.18 for Ennis. The analysis showed no significant difference among the three frameworks, indicating comparable effectiveness in supporting students’ ability to develop critical thinking assessment instruments.
Co-Authors Arif, Rifda Nur Hikmahwati Nur Indah Sari Ramlawati