MR Hutagalung, Indriani
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Transformation of the TNI Navy Hospital to a Public Service Agency in the Context of Validating the TNI Navy Health Organization: Literature Review Setiadi, Tiya; MR Hutagalung, Indriani; Faisol, Ahmad
Journal of Midwifery History and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jmhp.v2i1.3748

Abstract

Background. Public sector reforms in Indonesia are driving government hospitals toward the Public Service Agency (BLU) model to enhance flexibility and service quality. As a key provider for military personnel and the national system, the Indonesian Navy Hospital (RSAL) is part of this significant management shift. Purpose. This study aims to analyze the transformation process of RSAL into a BLU institution and explore its implications for the validation of the Navy’s health organization. Method. The research utilizes a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA approach, analyzing academic publications, government regulations, and hospital management data. Results. The BLU model improves financial management and operational efficiency. However, challenges remain in governance and human resources, as the rigid military structure often complicates the adoption of the flexible systems required by the BLU model. Conclusion. Successful transformation requires a comprehensive strategy focused on human resource development, policy alignment, and improved organizational governance to bridge the gap between military and BLU systems.
LEGAL AUTHORITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS BOUNDARIES IN MILITARY POLICING: NAVIGATING THE DUAL MANDATE OF DISCIPLINE ENFORCEMENT AND CIVIL PROTECTION Iqbal, Deni; Wijiantoro, Hendro; MR Hutagalung, Indriani
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.3637

Abstract

Military policing operates at the intersection of disciplinary authority and civilian engagement, creating complex tensions between enforcement mandates and human rights obligations in contemporary security environments. Expanding roles in peacekeeping, internal security, and hybrid operations have exposed gaps in legal clarity and accountability mechanisms. This study aims to examine how legal authority is defined and applied in military policing and how human rights boundaries are maintained under dual mandates. A qualitative doctrinal and socio-legal approach was employed, combining analysis of legal instruments, comparative frameworks, and secondary operational data across jurisdictions. Findings indicate that while disciplinary authority is comprehensively regulated, civilian engagement rules, detention safeguards, and oversight mechanisms remain inconsistently defined. Policy coherence, institutional oversight, and training significantly influence compliance with human rights standards, while legal ambiguity increases reliance on discretion and risk of violations. The study concludes that effective military policing requires harmonized legal frameworks, explicit operational guidelines, and strengthened accountability systems to balance authority with rights protection. Integration of legal clarity and institutional capacity is essential for ensuring consistent and rights-compliant practice in evolving security contexts.