Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kontektualisasi Risalah al-Qadha Masa Khalifah Umar Bin Khattab dan Relevansinya Terhadap Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Bahrul Ulum; Ibnu Alfin
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

History proves that the judiciary has existed and been known since time immemorial, in the course of Islamic history, the judicial system has been known since the time of the Prophet Muhammad. In this Treatise there is a lot of legal content and things that we can learn and apply, in the Religious Courts in Indonesia there are many similarities and conformities with the Treatise of Umar which was given to Abu Musa Al-Asy Ari, in fact many scholars quote this Treatise, because when studied in more depth this Treatise can really be used as a legal benchmark and guide to apply, as well as many judges in Indonesia who study and apply it when deciding legal and justice cases. The aim is to find out the extent of the Al-Qadha Treatise and its relevance in Religious Courts when applied from the perspective of one of the books: Religious Court Procedural Law Plus Principles of Islamic Procedural Law in Umar Bin Khattab's Qadha Treatise. This research method is in the library research genre with the aim of researchers being able to find out that the Al-Qadha Treatise is very relevant to Religious Courts in Indonesia, using a qualitative descriptive analysis approach. The results of this research show that Umar Bin Khattab sent a letter to judge Kuffah. In the contents of the letter there are two legal provisions; firstly the procedures of religious courts, secondly the competence of judges. b) During Umar's leadership the system of power was divided into the three parts that we know today (trias politica). c) The concepts in the Al-Qadha Treatise are similar to the Religious Courts in Indonesia. d) Likewise, in his ijtihad, Umar Bin Khattab cannot be separated from the Al-Quran, Ijma, Qiyas and Ra'yu. e) Indonesian Islamic Courts, several points in Umar's letter are in line with Indonesian Court procedures, this indicates that, in fact, the judiciary during the time of Umar Bin Khattab was an Islamic Court, which also applies to Islamic Courts in Indonesia.
Keabsahan Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu Dalam Perkara Itsbat Nikah (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 794/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Kab.Malang Bahrul Ulum; M. Malik Anwar
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 8: Juli 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i8.17489

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian dalam jurnal tersebut adalah untuk meneliti sejauh mana kesaksian testimonium de auditu dapat digunakan dan diakui keabsahannya sebagai alat bukti dalam perkara itsbat nikah, khususnya dalam Putusan Nomor 794/Pdt.P/2025/PA.KAB.Mlg, serta untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam menerima dan menilai kesaksian tersebut menurut hukum acara Islam dan hukum acara perdata. Kajian ini termasuk dalam kategori penelitian studi pustaka, dengan fokus pada ruang lingkup asas hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta yurisprudensi yang berkaitan dengan pembuktian menggunakan alat bukti berupa kesaksian testimonium de auditu. Untuk memperoleh data, dilakukan analisis terhadap berbagai sumber hukum, yang meliputi bahan hukum primer berupa Putusan Perkara Nomor 794/Pdt.P/2025/PA.KAB.Mlg, serta bahan hukum sekunder seperti hasil penelitian hukum, majalah, jurnal, dan dokumen lain yang relevan dengan pengesahan perkara pernikahan yang didasarkan pada kesaksian de auditu. Testimonium de auditu adalah bentuk kesaksian yang diperoleh dari cerita atau keterangan pihak lain, bukan dari pengalaman langsung saksi, sehingga pada dasarnya tidak memenuhi syarat materiil kesaksian baik dalam hukum acara Islam maupun hukum acara perdata. Dalam perkara itsbat nikah Nomor 794/Pdt.P/2025/PA.KAB.Mlg, dua saksi yang diajukan oleh para Pemohon memang telah memenuhi syarat formil karena sudah dewasa dan disumpah, namun keterangan yang diberikan tetap tergolong sebagai kesaksian de auditu karena hanya bersumber dari penuturan para Pemohon serta informasi yang beredar di masyarakat. Walaupun demikian, dalam kondisi tertentu kesaksian semacam ini dapat dipertimbangkan secara khusus (eksepsional), sebagaimana diakui dalam doktrin, yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung, serta konsep syahādah al-istifāḍah dalam hukum Islam, terutama apabila informasi tersebut telah tersebar luas, tidak mendapat bantahan, atau ketika saksi yang mengetahui secara langsung tidak dapat dihadirkan. Dalam perkara ini, keterangan kedua saksi dinilai saling bersesuaian dan diperkuat dengan bukti tertulis, sehingga tetap dapat digunakan sebagai dasar persangkaan untuk meneguhkan adanya pernikahan sirri para Pemohon dan layak dipertimbangkan dalam proses pembuktian menurut hukum acara Islam maupun hukum acara perdata.
Pemikiran Bung Karno dan Fatima Mernissi Tentang Emansipasi Perempuan dan Relevansinya terhadap Hak dan Kewajiban Suami-Istri dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Bahrul Ulum; Khofi
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (May)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v6i2.1171

Abstract

This study analyzes the relevance of the thoughts of Bung Karno and Fatima Mernissi regarding the rights and obligations of husbands and wives in Islamic family law in Indonesia, as well as their contribution to the development of a more just family law paradigm. Using a qualitative library research approach with comparative analysis of the works of both figures and literature on Islamic family law and gender justice. The findings show that both figures share the same orientation in realizing fair and dignified relations between men and women, albeit through different approaches. Bung Karno views women's emancipation as part of the national struggle against oppression and for national strengthening, while Fatima Mernissi emphasizes the importance of reinterpreting Islamic teachings to correct patriarchal interpretations that are inconsistent with Islamic principles of justice. The synthesis of both thoughts produces a conceptual framework that positions the husband-wife relationship as a partnership based on deliberation, shared responsibility, respect for each other's rights, and orientation toward family well-being (maslahah). The study concludes that the development of Islamic family law in Indonesia should be directed toward strengthening substantive justice without ignoring the principles of sharia. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of Bung Karno and Fatima Mernissi's thoughts as a conceptual foundation for reforming Islamic family law to be more contextual, responsive, and oriented toward achieving the objectives of Islamic family law