Daker, Sonam
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Students’ Perspectives on Integrating Generative AI Tools into Teaching, Learning, and Assessment in Higher Education: A Case of the Royal University of Bhutan Tamang, Tshering Om; Daker, Sonam; Gurung, Bhupen; Dorji, Ugyen
Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy
Publisher : Scientia Publica Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70232/jrep.v3i2.153

Abstract

This study explored students’ perspectives on the benefits and challenges of integrating Generative AI (GenAI) tools in teaching, learning, and assessment within five colleges under the Royal University of Bhutan (RUB). The study is timely and relevant as educators and students in Bhutan increasingly adopt GenAI tools, reflecting a broader global trend. The study outlines three primary objectives. First, it seeks students’ perspectives regarding the integration of GenAI tools in teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education, highlighting the GenAI tools used, the benefits they offer, and the challenges they may impose. Second, the study aspires to provide practical recommendations for educators and academics in higher education institutions for the effective integration of GenAI tools. Finally, the study aims to provide recommendations to relevant stakeholders and policymakers for the adoption or expansion of AI initiatives within the precincts of RUB colleges. This study employed a qualitative approach as qualitative research allows for a deeper understanding of human behaviour and experiences. A purposive sampling technique was used to ensure that participants were selected based on their potential to provide valuable insights relevant to the research objectives. Data were collected through semi-structured focus group interviews, with each group comprising six members (three male and three female). A total of 180 students participated across 30 focus group interviews conducted in five colleges, with six focus group interviews in each college. The data collected were transcribed, coded, and categorised into themes for analysis. To maintain confidentiality, the researchers used a systematic labelling system for both focus groups and individual students during the data analysis process, enabling a comprehensive and structured interpretation of the findings. The findings revealed key benefits of GenAI, such as providing quick and accessible information, fostering personalised learning, and offering emotional support. However, the findings also revealed challenges in terms of the reliability of AI-generated content, the potential hindrance to creativity and critical thinking, and the risk of social and emotional disconnect between students and their learning communities due to overreliance on GenAI. The study therefore recommends raising awareness and improving understanding of GenAI tools among students and establishing comprehensive policy frameworks to promote their ethical use across RUB colleges while upholding high standards of academic quality.