This paper aims to find out the differences and similarities in the roles and positions of constitutional institutions between Iran and Indonesia. Several Islamic countries have succeeded in finding a harmonious form in elaborating between religion and democracy which is marked by the existence of a constitution. Conflicts between religion and democracy often occur in the preparation of the state administration sistem. Iran and Indonesia are both pioneers of the existence of a constitutional institution to ensure the enactment of the constitution as a basic agreement for all citizens and the government of a country. So it is important to know how the political commitment of a country in ensuring all power runs within constitutive boundaries. This research is a literature research, through normative juridical and socio-historical approaches, the data are then analyzed descriptively and comparatively. The results of the study show that the role and position of the constitutional institutions between Iran and Indonesia have a number of similarities and differences. This is due to the background of the cultural and religious patterns.
Copyrights © 2021