Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara
Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara

THE DEBATE OVER MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF STATE TERRORISM

Kartini, Indriana (Pusat Penelitian Politik LIPI)

Article Info

Publish Date
05 Aug 2018

Abstract

This essay examines the debate over moral justifications of state terrorism. Consequentialist and deontologist perspectives provide a framework to justify acts of terrorism. However, this framework can not absolutely be defended. By drawing on Tony Coady and Igor Primoratz point of views, it is argued that acts of terrorism perpetrated by the state can never be justified and it is morally wrong and worse than non-state terrorism. Keywords : state terrorism, moral justification, consequentialist, deontologist

Copyrights © 2014




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
226.252 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara
Website

Abbrev

JPBH

Publisher

Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia

Subject

Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Description

Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara adalah merupakan wadah para dosen, peneliti, dan mahasiswa untuk meningkatkan kualifikasi dan kompetensi akademik, sekaligus perwujudan kontribusi intelektual terhadap perkembangan keilmuan di bidang Pertahanan dan Bela Negara melalui tulisan ilmiah baik berupa kajian ...