The aim of this research is to analyze behavior of Supreme Courtâs judge on detention period sentence for illegal logging defendants in Indonesia from year 2002 through 2008.The first analysis is censored normal regression method using detention period indictment by prosecutor, detention period sentence by district court, defendantâs gender, appealeffort, defendantâs age, and defendantâs job variables. Those variables are used to analyze how each variable affect on Supreme Courtâs verdict on detention period sentence forillegal logging defendants in Indonesia. Second analysis is descriptive statistic involves three levels of jurisdictionâs considerations (prosecutor, district court, and SupremeCourt) on determining detention period sentence for illegal logging defendants in Indonesia and suitability those three levels of jurisdiction to law. Researchâs result showsthat detention period indictment by prosecutor, detention period sentence by district court, and defendantâs age significantly affect on Supreme Courtâs verdict on detention period sentence for illegal logging defendants in Indonesia. But, on the other hand there is unsuitable verdict made by those three levels of jurisdiction to law.Keywords: courtâs verdict, illegal logging, censored normal regression
Copyrights © 2010