<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Perubahan Undang-Undang Batas Usia Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden (Capres-Cawapres) pada Pasal 169 huruf q Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu. telah menarik perhatian dalam perspektif Rasional Choice dan isu nepotisme. Penelitian ini melibatkan analisis mendalam terhadap dinamika politik yang terjadi seiring perubahan tersebut. Dengan menggunakan kerangka kerja Rasional Choice, penelitian ini mencoba memahami alasan di balik perubahan regulasi tersebut, apakah didorong oleh pertimbangan politik, opini publik, atau kepentingan kelompok tertentu. Tujuan penelitian ini juga mengupas isu nepotisme yang muncul seiring keterlibatan anak Presiden sebagai calon Wakil Presiden. Pemahaman Rasional Choice di sini terfokus pada bagaimana keputusan ini mungkin dipengaruhi oleh kepentingan keluarga dan strategi politik. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan yang mendalam terkait dinamika politik dan implikasi Rasional Choice dalam perubahan undang-undang yang terkait batas usia Capres-Cawapres. Penelitian ini membahas masalah dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif serta analisis data berdasarkan peraturan undang-undang. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa pemahaman terhadap pemilihan calon presiden dan wakil presiden dan aspek-aspek Rasional Choice yang mungkin terlibat menjadi krusial. inti nya mencakup pertimbangan tentang bagaimana keputusan tersebut dapat dilihat dari sudut pandang keuntungan politik, dan bagaimana opini publik dapat mempengaruhi dinamika politik di Indonesia.Kata kunci : Batas, Choice, Nepotisme, Rasional, Usia. ABSTRACT Amendment of the Act on the Age Limit of Candidates for President and Vice-President (Capres-Cawapres) on Article 169 letter q of Act No. 7 of 2017 on Elections. has drawn attention in the perspective of Rational Choice and the issue of nepotism. This research involves an in-depth analysis of the political dynamics that occurred as these changes occurred. Using the Rational Choice framework, this study tries to understand the reasons behind such regulatory changes, whether driven by political considerations, public opinion, or the interests of a particular group. The purpose of this study is also to expose the issue of nepotism that emerged with the involvement of the President's son as a Vice President candidate. Choice's rational understanding here focuses on how these decisions may be influenced by family interests and political strategies. The results of this research are expected to provide in-depth insight into the political dynamics and implications of the Rational Choice in the legislative changes related to the Capres-Cawapres age limit. The research addresses problems using descriptive qualitative approaches as well as data analysis based on legal regulations. The research finds that an understanding of the election of presidential and vice presidential candidates and the aspects of Rational Choice that may be involved is crucial. Its core includes consideration of how the decision can be seen from the point of view of political gain, and how public opinion can influence the political dynamics in Indonesia. Keywords: Limits, Choice, Nepotism, Rationality, Age. ]]>
Copyrights © 2024
