<![CDATA[Some of the lawsuit divorce decisions are considered gender biased so that the Mahkamah Agung makes a legal breakthrough as a form of protection of women's rights with the existence of Perma No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating women's cases. However, empirical facts prove that the regulation cannot be implemented in Decision Number 330/Pdt.G/2022/MS. Bna due to various reasons. Therefore, the sensitivity of judges in examining a case is very important to provide protection for women's rights. The purpose of this research is to find out the views of the judges of the Mahkamah Syar'iyah of Banda Aceh city on women's rights after divorce and analyze according to Islamic law the injustice of women's rights after divorce. The type of research used in this research is juridical-empirical which is field research. The data sources that researchers use include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The type of data used in this research is primary data, namely data obtained directly from sources through interviews with judges of the Mahkamah Syar'iyah Banda Aceh. The data was analyzed using descriptive analysis method. The results of this study indicate that judges at the Mahkamah Syar'iyah have attempted to provide fair protection to women who are dealing with the law in cases of contested divorce, but in Decision Number 330/Pdt.G/2022/MS. Bna, it is still the same.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
