This study aims to describe the perceptions of students of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jambi towards the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in compiling scientific papers as the final assignment of the undergraduate education program. Using a quantitative approach, this study found that the mastery of the AI program was dominated by natural science students (66.40%), while social science students were only 33.60%. In terms of writing skills, natural science students had an average mastery of 64%, compared to 36% for social science students. Student perceptions of the use of AI in writing scientific papers showed positive results, with 86% of students strongly agreeing, 9% agreeing, and the rest being hesitant or disagreeing. In addition, the percentage of students who felt helped in terms of grammar reached an average of 92.66%, and in terms of the technique of compiling and developing scientific papers, the average was 91.58%. The results of hypothesis testing using ANOVA analysis showed a very small significance value (0.000), which means there is a significant relationship between the use of AI and the ability to write scientific papers. This study concludes that the mastery of various AI programs is dominated by natural science students compared to students from social science backgrounds.
Copyrights © 2024