<![CDATA[ The purpose of this study is to examine and know more deeply how the concept of punishment of the two figures, as well as compare the two concepts to find similarities and differences. This research uses qualitative approach, type of literature (library research), with comparative method. Analysis techniques used are content analysis techniques and comparative analysis techniques. From the results of the study, the authors found that, although the two discussed both methods of punishment, there are differences in terms of the formation of the concept of thought, namely on the source of thought, the type of reasoning used, the figure or model in the concept of thought, the intended subject and the lack of orientation. In addition, there are similarities and differences in terms of the content of thought, similarities obtained in terms of principle or causality, utility or usefulness, the presence of side effects, as well as the priorities of theory. While the differences are obtained in terms of the specifics of the discussion, the purpose of punishment, opinions in looking at punishment, the pattern of punishment, the absence of stages of application, intervention, and approval of the use of punishment. ]]>
Copyrights © 2021
