The objectives of this study are as follows: To determine the students' learning outcomes in Fiqh before using the cooperative learning model "Numbered Head Together" at RA Uqail Afkar during the 2019/2020 academic year. To identify the improvement in Fiqh learning outcomes after using the "Numbered Head Together" cooperative learning model at RA Uqail Afkar during the 2019/2020 academic year. The research location was chosen because there had never been a study conducted regarding the problem being investigated. The population refers to a group of individuals or groups observed in a study. From the population, the necessary data for the research will be collected. The population of this study consisted of all students in RA Uqail Afkar in the 2019/2020 academic year, totaling 104 students across three parallel classes. In alignment with the research objectives, which fundamentally aim to measure student learning achievements, the research utilized descriptive analysis. The classroom action research model used in this study followed the Kemmis & McTaggart model. In this model, the research process was divided into four stages: planning, implementation of actions, observation, and reflection. The results of the study conducted during Cycle I and Cycle II using the "Numbered Head Together" cooperative learning model for students at RA Uqail Afkar showed an improvement in student learning outcomes and engagement in Fiqh subjects. The conclusions of this study are as follows, The "Numbered Head Together" cooperative learning model provides students with learning experiences through problem-solving, increasing students' engagement in learning activities, with student engagement reaching 71% in Cycle I, and increasing to 78% in Cycle II and The "Numbered Head Together" cooperative learning model encourages students to engage in problem-solving activities, thereby improving their learning outcomes. This is evidenced by test results from Cycle I and Cycle II. The average student score in Cycle I was 69, which increased to 80 in Cycle II, while the students' learning mastery improved from 69% in Cycle I to 86% in Cycle II.
Copyrights © 2024