<![CDATA[This case study examines the obstacles to the execution of religious civil court decisions due to clerical errors in the dispositive part of the decision, specifically in Decision Number 2499/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JB. The research employs a normative juridical approach using a library research method, analyzing relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and jurisprudence. The findings reveal that clerical errors, even if they do not alter the substance of the case, can create legal uncertainty, hinder execution, and force the aggrieved party to undergo additional legal processes, such as a Judicial Review and a new lawsuit. This highlights that clerical errors are not merely administrative issues but also impact justice and the effectiveness of the law. The study recommends increased diligence in reviewing and correcting the dispositive part of decisions, developing efficient repair mechanisms, raising public legal awareness, developing standards and guidelines for writing dispositive parts of decisions, and improving the quality of human resources in the religious court system.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
