<![CDATA[Kepemimpinan merupakan faktor penting bagi keberhasilan organisasi karena tanpa kepemimpinanyang baik, tujuan bersama sulit tercapai. Fenomena kepemimpinan manipulatif dalam film The Wolfof Wall Street memberikan gambaran bagaimana kekuasaan dapat disalahgunakan untukkepentingan pribadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis representasi kepemimpinanmanipulatif Jordan Belfort serta relevansinya dengan teori kepemimpinan dan kekuasaan. Metodeyang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik analisis isi, melalui pengkajian adeganadegankunci film dan literatur pendukung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Belfortmenerapkan tiga bentuk utama manipulasi, yaitu bahasa persuasif, manipulasi emosional, daniming-iming finansial. Strategi tersebut menimbulkan dampak berbeda pada tiga level: karyawanyang termotivasi secara emosional namun tereksploitasi, investor yang mengalami kerugianfinansial, serta organisasi Stratton Oakmont yang runtuh akibat praktik ilegal. Analisis jugamenegaskan keterkaitan gaya kepemimpinan Belfort dengan teori power bases French & Raven,konsep kekuasaan Weber, dan perspektif Foucault mengenai kontrol. Temuan ini menunjukkanperlunya organisasi menghindari gaya kepemimpinan manipulatif demi menjaga reputasi dankeberlanjutan, serta mendorong penelitian lebih lanjut untuk membandingkan fenomena serupadalam film atau konteks nyata. Leadership is a crucial factor for organizational success, as without effective leadership, shared goals aredifficult to achieve. The phenomenon of manipulative leadership in The Wolf of Wall Street illustrates howpower can be misused for personal gain. This study aims to analyze the representation of Jordan Belfort’smanipulative leadership and its relevance to leadership and power theories. The research employs adescriptive qualitative method with content analysis, examining key scenes from the film alongside supportingliterature. The findings reveal that Belfort applied three main forms of manipulation: persuasive language,emotional manipulation, and financial incentives. These strategies had distinct impacts at three levels:employees who were emotionally driven yet exploited, investors who suffered financial losses, and theorganization Stratton Oakmont which collapsed due to illegal practices. The analysis further highlights theconnection between Belfort’s leadership style and French & Raven’s power bases, Weber’s concept ofauthority, and Foucault’s perspective on control. The study underscores the importance of avoidingmanipulative leadership to safeguard organizational reputation and sustainability, while suggesting furtherresearch to compare similar phenomena in other films or real contexts]]>
Copyrights © 2026
