<![CDATA[This study analyzes the effectiveness of the governance of higher education institutions with Public Service Agency (BLU) and Work Unit (SATKER) status using the CIPPO (Context–Input–Process–Product–Outcome) evaluation model. The study locations include UNHAS, UNM, and UINAM as BLU PTNs, and UNG and POLIMDO as SATKER PTNs. The study used a mixed-method approach through document analysis, a survey of 150 respondents, and interviews with eight key informants. The results show that BLU universities excel in Input, Process, Product, and Outcome aspects due to the flexibility of PNBP management, accelerated decision-making, and higher innovation capabilities. In contrast, SATKER universities have the strength of regulatory stability, but are less adaptive in responding to changes in the higher education environment. These findings support the theories of Adaptive Governance, Agile University, and Dynamic Capability, which indicate that governance flexibility is a key factor in increasing the competitiveness of higher education institutions in the era of digital transformation. The study recommends the need for bureaucratic reform and increased flexibility for SATKER universities to improve their performance and competitiveness]]>
Copyrights © 2025
