<![CDATA[The increasing complexity of corporate business activities has intensified the potential for commercial disputes, thereby necessitating effective, efficient, and legally certain dispute resolution mechanisms. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred alternative for corporations due to its flexibility, confidentiality, and reliance on contractual autonomy. This study examines the legal status of corporations as subjects of law in arbitration, the scope of contractual autonomy in determining arbitral mechanisms, and the limits of state intervention through courts in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes Law Number 30 of 1999 and relevant legal doctrines through systematic stages of issue identification, legal material collection, normative analysis, and conclusion formulation. The findings indicate that corporations possess full legal capacity to bind themselves to arbitration agreements and are obligated to comply with final and binding arbitral awards. Judicial intervention is strictly limited to procedural aspects of recognition, enforcement, and annulment, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
