Arbitration in Indonesia serves as a strategic alternative dispute resolution mechanism, legally grounded in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This study examines the position, legal force, and practical implications of arbitral awards within the national judicial system. Employing a normative juridical method combined with a descriptive qualitative approach, the research analyzes legislation, arbitral awards, court decisions, and relevant literature. Data collection involved literature review, secondary data on national and international awards, and juridical analysis of court supervision and enforcement practices. The findings indicate that arbitral awards are final and binding, while courts retain limited oversight for annulment or enforcement, ensuring legal certainty and justice. The study also highlights the strategic role of arbitration in supporting business operations, enhancing investor confidence, and promoting efficient dispute resolution. Ultimately, arbitral awards contribute to a credible, neutral, and effective legal framework, fostering a favorable investment climate and strengthening Indonesia’s competitiveness in the global economy.
Copyrights © 2026