Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Analysis of Changes to Social Security Regulations for Workers in the Job Creation Law Arsyad Riski Pratama Siregar; Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung; Suci Hidayati Malau; Siti Kholizah
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): ISNU Nine Star September 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v2i2.813

Abstract

The provisions regarding social security for workers, previously regulated by Law No. 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System and Law No. 24 of 2011 concerning the Social Security Administering Body, have been significantly amended by Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. The purpose of this study is to examine these normative changes from a legal perspective, focusing on their impact on the defense of workers' rights. Normative legal research employs legislative and intellectual approaches. Through a literature review of laws and regulations, court decisions, and legal documents, data is analyzed qualitatively. According to the study, the modifications outlined in the Job Creation Law, particularly those related to the unemployment insurance program, could result in a loss of legal certainty and a decline in workers' social security standards. Furthermore, the concepts of social justice and legal certainty are questioned by the introduction of more flexible social security in the context of investment interests. Therefore, to ensure that social protection for workers is maintained within the context of national economic development, it is necessary to strengthen its derivative legislation and implement a strict oversight system.
The Legal Authority of Arbitral Awards in the Indonesian Judicial System: Reconciling Party Autonomy, Judicial Supervision, and Legal Certainty Abdul Hakim; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; Yara Shita; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1307

Abstract

Arbitration has become an increasingly important mechanism for resolving commercial disputes due to its efficiency, finality, and procedural flexibility. Nevertheless, the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system remains conceptually debated because such awards originate from private agreements while simultaneously requiring judicial recognition and enforcement under public law. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined arbitral awards from procedural perspectives, particularly regarding enforcement and annulment, with limited attention to the institutional foundations that determine their legal authority. This study aims to analyze the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system and to reconstruct the interaction between contractual autonomy, judicial supervision, and statutory legitimacy in determining their binding effect. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes legislation, legal doctrines, arbitral awards, and relevant scholarly literature using systematic legal interpretation and prescriptive legal reasoning. The findings demonstrate that the legal force of arbitral awards is not derived solely from party autonomy but from the interaction of four complementary dimensions: contractual legitimacy, procedural integrity, institutional recognition through limited judicial supervision, and international legitimacy under the 1958 New York Convention. Judicial oversight functions as a procedural safeguard rather than substantive appellate review, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty. This study contributes to contemporary arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated conceptual framework explaining how privately generated arbitral awards acquire public legal authority within Indonesia's judicial system, thereby strengthening legal certainty, investor confidence, and the effectiveness of commercial dispute resolution.
The Relevance of the Concept of Hirabah to Organized Crime and Modern Terrorism Hairul Anam; Ahmad Rifai Yoga; Nadilah Andini; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung; Suci Hidayati Malau
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1325

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of the concept of hirābah in Islamic criminal law to contemporary organized crime and terrorism. Historically, hirābah addresses acts of open violence that threaten public security, instill fear, and disrupt social order, with sanctions aimed at protecting life, property, and communal stability. Using a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, the study analyzes classical fiqh texts, contemporary scholarship, and comparative legal frameworks to explore the elements, characteristics, and objectives of hirābah. The findings reveal substantial conceptual alignment between classical hirābah and modern forms of collective violence, as both involve deliberate acts that destabilize society and generate widespread fear. However, contemporary crimes exhibit complex ideological, transnational, and technological dimensions requiring normative adaptation. The study concludes that while hirābah provides a valuable legal and sociological framework, its application to modern criminality necessitates contextual reconstruction, integrating Islamic jurisprudence with national and international legal systems for effective prevention, deterrence, and public security.
The Legal Authority of Arbitral Awards in the Indonesian Judicial System: Reconciling Party Autonomy, Judicial Supervision, and Legal Certainty Abdul Hakim; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; Yara Shita; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1307

Abstract

Arbitration has become an increasingly important mechanism for resolving commercial disputes due to its efficiency, finality, and procedural flexibility. Nevertheless, the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system remains conceptually debated because such awards originate from private agreements while simultaneously requiring judicial recognition and enforcement under public law. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined arbitral awards from procedural perspectives, particularly regarding enforcement and annulment, with limited attention to the institutional foundations that determine their legal authority. This study aims to analyze the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system and to reconstruct the interaction between contractual autonomy, judicial supervision, and statutory legitimacy in determining their binding effect. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes legislation, legal doctrines, arbitral awards, and relevant scholarly literature using systematic legal interpretation and prescriptive legal reasoning. The findings demonstrate that the legal force of arbitral awards is not derived solely from party autonomy but from the interaction of four complementary dimensions: contractual legitimacy, procedural integrity, institutional recognition through limited judicial supervision, and international legitimacy under the 1958 New York Convention. Judicial oversight functions as a procedural safeguard rather than substantive appellate review, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty. This study contributes to contemporary arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated conceptual framework explaining how privately generated arbitral awards acquire public legal authority within Indonesia's judicial system, thereby strengthening legal certainty, investor confidence, and the effectiveness of commercial dispute resolution.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Ahmad Rifai Yoga Arsyad Riski Pratama Siregar Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis Hairul Anam Nadilah Andini Siti Kholizah Suci Hidayati Malau Yara Shita