Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): July

Exploring science teachers’ readiness for deep learning implementation through teaching module analysis and lesson study

Yayuk Mulyati (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
Nasrunniati Dyahayu Anggi Winarni (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
Indra Fardhani (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
Erni Yulianti (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
H. Habiddin (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
S. Sugiyanto (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
Umi Fitriyati (Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)
Elisa Mariana Magnani (SMP Negeri 04 Batu, East Java, Indonesia)
Erti Hamimi (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)



Article Info

Publish Date
24 May 2026

Abstract

Background-This study examines junior high school science teachers’ readiness to implement deep learning (DL) within the Merdeka Curriculum through teaching module analysis, surveys, UbD-based workshops, and Lesson Study (LS). Objectives-The objectives of this study are: (1) to analyze the cognitive levels of learning objectives (LO) and their alignment with DL principles, and (2) to evaluate the development of teachers’ reflective practices through LS. Method-This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining survey data from 22 teachers with qualitative analysis of teaching documents, classroom observations, and LS reflections. Results-The findings show that 77% of teachers designed lessons collaboratively and 45% developed relatively complete learning tools, although only 4% applied UbD principles. Analysis of 90 LOs indicates that 70.45% were categorized as lower-order thinking skills (LOTS), dominated by C2 (51.13%) and C3 (15.91%), while HOTS remained limited. The average alignment between assessment and LO reached ±89%, but was mostly structural rather than conceptual. LS implementation improved teachers’ awareness of alignment and reflective practices, particularly in LS-2. Conclusions-These findings indicate that teachers demonstrate emerging readiness for DL; however, continuous support is needed to strengthen conceptual alignment and meaningful learning design.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

raden

Publisher

Subject

Education

Description

Research and Development in Education is a scientific journal that aims at publishing research results and review in Research and Development of education in various science fields. Research and Development results can be in classroom-oriented, product-oriented, and system-oriented perspectives ...