Teaching abstract science concepts like the human motion system remains challenging in elementary schools. This study compared four learning models to improve students’ conceptual understanding: AR-integrated EASI, EASI without AR, AR-only, and conventional lecture–discussion. Using a quasi-experimental design, 120 sixth-graders from four Indonesian elementary schools were tested using SOLO Taxonomy-based instruments. Data were analyzed via ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Results showed significant differences among groups (p = 0.000). The EASI+AR model yielded the highest improvement (N-Gain = 0.7287) and significantly outperformed AR-only and conventional models. AR alone did not significantly enhance understanding. In conclusion, technology integration requires a solid pedagogical framework like EASI to effectively boost conceptual understanding. Practically, these findings imply that educators and curriculum developers must prioritize pedagogically-driven technology rather than standalone digital tools to optimize elementary science learning.
Copyrights © 2026