This study is motivated by the complexity of the Temajuk–Telok Melano border area, which involves not only national sovereignty and security interests but also the socio-economic needs of communities that maintain geographical, social, and economic relations with the Malaysian border region. This study aims to analyze the socio-economic conditions and community needs, the role of deliberation in formulating cross-border policies, and such policies from the perspectives of constitutional law and maṣlaḥah. This research employs a qualitative approach through field research and a case study conducted in the border area of Temajuk, Paloh District, Sambas Regency. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings indicate that the need to strengthen cross-border access is closely related to community trade activities, mobility, and social relations. Deliberation provides a space for articulating community needs and aspirations in the policy process, although the authority to determine cross-border policies remains vested in state institutions. From a constitutional law perspective, community participation through deliberation can enhance policy responsiveness without diminishing the state's authority to safeguard sovereignty, security, and public order. From the perspective of maṣlaḥah, strengthening cross-border access and governance constitutes al-maṣlaḥah al-hajiyyah, as it facilitates and reduces difficulties in community socio-economic activities. Cross-border policy should be directed toward participatory, proportional, secure, and maṣlaḥah-oriented access governance while maintaining state interests and authority.
Copyrights © 2026