<![CDATA[Sanctions for State Administrative Officials who do not implement the decision of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) which has permanent legal force are regulated in Article 116 of the State Administrative Court Law. These sanctions include administrative and civil coercive measures, including the imposition of coercive money. However, the implementation of these sanctions has not been running effectively and efficiently. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate the coercive measure mechanism by implementing gijzeling sanctions (hostage-taking) as an alternative step to increase the compliance of TUN officials with court decisions. This study aims to examine the idea of reformulating the application of gijzeling as part of the coercive measure mechanism in PTUN. The method used is legal research with a statute approach and conceptual approach, and descriptive qualitative data analysis. The results of the study indicate that gijzeling sanctions have been applied in several forms of administrative justice, such as the Tax Court in Indonesia, which is part of the PTUN environment. Therefore, the application of gijzeling as a coercive measure in the PTUN needs to be considered, especially for TUN officials who do not act in good faith in implementing court decisions. This aims to increase compliance, maintain the authority of the judicial institution, and ensure justice for the community.The significance of this research lies in its contribution to the development of administrative law enforcement mechanisms in Indonesia, by offering an innovative solution to improve the effectiveness of court decisions and uphold legal certainty and accountability among public officials.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
