<![CDATA[The Study of Law enforcement concerning the criminal act of embezzlement as regulated in Article 372 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and the criminal act of fraud as regulated in Article 378 of the KUHP highlights the importance of analyzing the prosecutor’s considerations in drafting an indictment. This research aims to understand how prosecutors determine the appropriate legal basis, whether by applying Article 372, Article 378, or both in an alternative construction, and how such legal considerations affect the criminal justice process. The findings indicate that in formulating an indictment, prosecutors take into account the elements of the criminal act, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and facts obtained during investigation. The use of combined charges under Article 372 and/or Article 378 KUHP is intended to ensure legal certainty while providing flexibility for judges in evaluating evidence during trial. Obstacles encountered include difficulties in proving criminal intent, divergent interpretations of legal elements, and the unavailability of key witnesses. Prosecutors overcome these challenges through strengthened coordination with investigators, sharpening juridical analysis, and selecting the most suitable indictment strategy. This study affirms that prosecutorial considerations in choosing the applicable articles of indictment play a central role in ensuring the effectiveness of law enforcement.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
