<![CDATA[Energy efficiency is a paramount challenge in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), directly impacting their operational lifetime and reliability. The reliance on limited, non-rechargeable battery resources establishes energy conservation as a critical design consideration for any WSN communication protocol. Hierarchical routing protocols, such as clustering, have been widely recognized as an effective strategy to address this issue. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two foundational hierarchical routing protocols: the Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH) and the Hybrid Energy-Efficient Distributed Clustering (HEED). As a pioneering protocol, LEACH utilizes a probabilistic Cluster Head (CH) rotation mechanism to balance the energy load. However, its drawback lies in neglecting critical parameters like the residual energy of nodes during CH selection. In contrast, HEED was introduced as an enhancement, employing a hybrid approach that considers residual energy as a primary parameter and intra-cluster communication cost as a secondary one to produce a more stable and energy-efficient topology. To evaluate the performance of both protocols, we conducted large-scale simulations focusing on key metrics, including network lifetime—measured by First Node Dies (FND), Half Nodes Die (HND), and Last Node Dies (LND)—total energy consumption, and data delivery performance. The results reveal a distinct trade-off between initial network stability and long-term resilience. HEED demonstrates superior performance in the initial phase, successfully delaying the first node's death (FND at round 286) by ensuring a more balanced energy load distribution. In contrast, LEACH provides a significantly longer overall network lifespan (LND at round 585) and achieves a higher data throughput, making it more resilient in the long term. The findings conclude that the choice between LEACH and HEED is application-dependent, highlighting the need to align the protocol's characteristics with specific network priorities, whether it be initial stability or maximum operational longevity]]>
Copyrights © 2026
