Analisi Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim dalam Membatalkan KTUN

Zahra Davika Mulyani (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)
Muhammad Faiz Zakwan (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)
Sheva Al-Hambra (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)
Fathir Putra Maulud (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)
Diva Raya Naysila Nada (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)
Taufiq Alamsyah (Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia)

RUMI
Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): RUMI (Rumah Ilmiah Jurnal Multidisiplin) (Juni)

The annulment of State Administrative Decisions (KTUN) by the State Administrative Court (PTUN) is a form of judicial oversight of government actions to ensure they remain within the legal corridor. This study aims to analyze the legal reasons used by judges in annulling KTUN. The research method used is normative legal research with a legal approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that PTUN judges in annulling KTUN generally base their decisions on violations of applicable laws and regulations, general principles of good governance (AUPB), and defects in authority, procedures, and substance in the issuance of KTUN. Thus, the annulment of KTUN is an effort to guarantee legal protection for the public from arbitrary administrative actions..