Trading practices in agricultural commodities at the farmer level are frequently marred by unethical behavior and information asymmetry, leading to unfair competition. This study aims to analyze the transaction patterns of hybrid coconut trading and its implications for transactional justice from the perspective of Islamic Business Ethics in Nipah Panjang II Village. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative approach based on field research, primary data were gathered from seven key informants, comprising five hybrid coconut farmers and two middlemen/buyers. The findings reveal that the executed trading practices do not fully align with the fundamental principles of Islamic Business Ethics. Non-compliance is reflected in violations of unity, equability ('adl), responsibility, and truthfulness/honesty. Buyers exhibited unethical behavior through unilateral weight deductions without transparency or proper justification. Conversely, farmers engaged in quality manipulation by applying chemical agents (alum) to artificially alter weight and conceal the true quality of the crop, resulting in mutual disadvantage. Consequently, the transactions merely satisfy the principle of free will based on mutual consent (an-taradin), while abandoning the core elements of justice and transparency in Islamic commercial law.
Copyrights © 2026