Disparitas Normatif dalam Rasio Decidendi Hakim: Telaah Atas Penerapan Asas Individualisasi Pidana terhadap Anak dalam Perkara Kekerasan Seksual

Muhammad Nur Arfan (Universitas Palangkaraya)
Nuraliah Ali (Universitas Palangkaraya)
Claudia Yuni Pramita (Universitas Palangkaraya)
Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang (Universitas Palangkaraya)

Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Vol 7 No 10 (2026): Tema Filsafat, Politik dan Etika Profesi Hukum

This study examines the principle of individualization of punishment and normative disparity by comparing Samarinda District Court Decision Number 26/Pid.SusAnak/2023/PN Smr and Sukabumi District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.SusAnak/2023/PN Skb. The problem centers on the tension between rehabilitative mandates and punitive tendencies in child sexual violence cases. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual and case approaches analyzed prescriptively. Findings reveal stark sentencing disparity between 10 months imprisonment with 2 months job training in the first decision and 4 years imprisonment with 6 months job training in the second due to the absence of measurable juvenile sentencing guidelines.