Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Claudia Yuni Pramita
Universitas Palangkaraya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Keracunan Makanan dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG): Analisis Asas Kausalitas dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Anesa Megawati Purada Siringoringo; Aristoteles Aristoteles; Claudia Yuni Pramita; Kristian Kristian
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v13i1.17963

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) is a government policy aimed at improving public nutrition and reducing stunting rates. However, its implementation has the potential to pose a risk of food poisoning, which can impact public health. This study aims to analyze the provisions of criminal liability for food poisoning in the implementation of the MBG Program and determine legal subjects who can be held criminally accountable. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. This research is motivated by the normative gap in Presidential Regulation Number 83 of 2024 and Presidential Regulation Number 115 of 2025, which do not yet regulate in detail the mechanism of criminal liability in the event of food poisoning in the MBG Program. The results of the study indicate that criminal liability can be based on the provisions of the Criminal Code, the Food Law, and the Health Law through the application of the principle of causality to determine the relationship between actions and their consequences. In addition to individuals, corporations as food providers can be held criminally accountable through a strict liability approach if harm to public health arises from food products that do not meet safety standards. The application of criminal penalties is carried out while still observing the principle of ultimum remedium. This research contributes to the development of food criminal law and strengthening legal protection for the community in the implementation of the MBG Program, and recommends strengthening criminal liability regulations in the implementation of the program.
Disparitas Normatif dalam Rasio Decidendi Hakim: Telaah Atas Penerapan Asas Individualisasi Pidana terhadap Anak dalam Perkara Kekerasan Seksual Muhammad Nur Arfan; Nuraliah Ali; Claudia Yuni Pramita; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 10 (2026): Tema Filsafat, Politik dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i10.4668

Abstract

This study examines the principle of individualization of punishment and normative disparity by comparing Samarinda District Court Decision Number 26/Pid.SusAnak/2023/PN Smr and Sukabumi District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.SusAnak/2023/PN Skb. The problem centers on the tension between rehabilitative mandates and punitive tendencies in child sexual violence cases. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual and case approaches analyzed prescriptively. Findings reveal stark sentencing disparity between 10 months imprisonment with 2 months job training in the first decision and 4 years imprisonment with 6 months job training in the second due to the absence of measurable juvenile sentencing guidelines.
Co-Authors Anesa Megawati Purada Siringoringo Aristoteles Aristoteles Kristian Kristian Muhammad Nur Arfan Nuraliah Ali Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang