<![CDATA[This study aims to optimize the workflow of smartphone-based portable recording media production by comparing technical and aesthetic effectiveness in video production. The study employed a comparative experimental approach combined with the development of a production workflow encompassing pre-production, production, post-production, and evaluation stages. The experiment involved two smartphones and compared two workflow scenarios. Supporting equipment included a tripod, gimbal, external microphone, and portable lighting. Evaluation was conducted by three expert validators and through a focus group discussion (FGD) involving ten participants. The evaluation covered visual quality and technical and aesthetic considerations throughout the production process. The research data were used to identify the characteristics of the recorded footage and formulate recommendations for production workflows suited to portable recording devices. Numerical scores for visual quality, the range of validator assessments, and measurable comparative results between the two workflow scenarios are not included in this abstract, as they require verification against the research findings. This study is expected to contribute to the development of efficient and adaptable practices for smartphone-based video production.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
