cover
Contact Name
Adi Suryadi
Contact Email
adisuryadi@eng.uir.ac.id
Phone
+62822 8389 6947
Journal Mail Official
jgeet@journal.uir.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Kaharuddin Nasution No 113 Perhentian Marpoyan, Pekanbaru, Riau 28284
Location
Kota pekanbaru,
Riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology
Published by Universitas Islam Riau
ISSN : 2503216X     EISSN : 25415794     DOI : 10.25299
JGEET (Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment and Technology) published the original research papers or reviews about the earth and planetary science, engineering, environment, and development of Technology related to geoscience. The objective of this journal is to disseminate the results of research and scientific studies which contribute to the understanding, development theories, and concepts of science and its application to the earth science or geoscience field. Terms of publishing the manuscript were never published or not being filed in other journals, manuscripts originating from local and International. JGEET (Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment and Technology) managed by the Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Islam Riau.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 551 Documents
Atterberg Limits Prediction Comparing SVM with ANFIS Model Mohammad Murtaza Sherzoy
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1073.151 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.16

Abstract

Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference Systems (ANFIS) both analytical methods are used to predict the values of Atterberg limits, such as the liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index. The main objective of this study is to make a comparison between both forecasts (SVM & ANFIS) methods. All data of 54 soil samples are used and taken from the area of Peninsular Malaysian and tested for different parameters containing liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index and grain size distribution and were. The input parameter used in for this case are the fraction of grain size distribution which are the percentage of silt, clay and sand. The actual and predicted values of Atterberg limit which obtained from the SVM and ANFIS models are compared by using the correlation coefficient R2 and root mean squared error (RMSE) value. The outcome of the study show that the ANFIS model shows higher accuracy than SVM model for the liquid limit (R2 = 0.987), plastic limit (R2 = 0.949) and plastic index (R2 = 0966). RMSE value that obtained for both methods have shown that the ANFIS model has represent the best performance than SVM model to predict the Atterberg Limits as a whole.
Planning TOD with land use and transport integration: a review Herika Muhamad Taki; Mohamed Mahmoud H. Maatouk; Emad Mohammad Qurnfulah; Mohammed Omayer Aljoufie
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1253.958 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.17

Abstract

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) implementation in urban development is globally adopted by many countries in the world in a rapid manner. However, the city and regional acute problems is still propagating. An in-depth study to examine this problem is required. Thus, this paper review various study related to the integration of land use and transport with TOD. The subject of the paper will be described as follow: Method, criteria and indicators of TOD'S research, Reviewing the strategic plan and the public transport plan in the worldwide, and Cross-continent comparison of integration planning. In conclusion, practice and integration of TOD through land use and transportation is an alternative solution in acquiring the objective of the master plan and to solve urban issues such as urban congestion, reduce travel time, and car dependency.
Composition And Characteristic Of The Surficial Sediments In The Southern Corniche Of Jeddah, Red Sea Coast Talha A Al-Dubai; Satria Antoni; Aaid G Al-Zubieri; Jawad Majeed
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (730.597 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.19

Abstract

This work discusses the composition and characteristic of the surficial sediments in the southern corniche of Jeddah, Saudi Red Sea coast, in an attempt to infer the surficial distribution pattern of minerals and provenance of sediments. Twenty-six superficial sediments samples were collected from backreef and forereef areas and were analyzed for grain size, CaCO3 content, and mineralogy. The textural of grain size range from gravel to mud fraction. The mud-dominated substrates (<63 µm) occur generally in the back-reef area near the shoreline (sheltered area) and in the lagoon. Gravel rich-sediments are mostly found in forereef regions. The highest content of aragonite and Mg-calcite occur in the forereef area, probably because to suitability the forereef region for chemical and biochemical precipitation of these minerals. High Mg-calcite and Dolomite are low in both the regions. The pyrite occurs in lagoon; this indicates the reductive conditions in this part. However, on the contrary the percentage of carbonate minerals were low in the backreef-flat area, which could be attributed to the supply of non-carbonate terrigenous materials. The terrigenous material contains quartz, k-feldspar, plagioclase and amphibole minerals and are dominant in backreef-flat area with averages of 12.7%, 7.13%, 2.93% and 0.65%, respectively. Their abundance could be attributed to the supply of terrigenous materials by Aeolian deposits and intermittent Wadis.
Geological Structure Analysis to Determine the Direction of the Main Stress at Western Part of Kolok Mudik, Barangin District, Sawahlunto, West Sumatera Miftahul Jannah; Adi Suryadi; Muchtar Zafir; Randi Saputra; Ihsanul Hakim; Riki Ariyuswanto; Ulfa Yusti
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (402.328 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.20

Abstract

On the study area there are three types of structure, those are fault, fold and joint. Types of fault were found in the study area, reverse fault with the strike/dip is N215oE/75o, normal fault has a fault directions N22oE and N200oE with pitch 35o, and dextral fault with pitch 10o and strike N219oE. Fold and joint structures used to determine the direction of the main stress on the study area. Further, an analysis used stereonet for data folds and joints. So that from the data got three directions of main stress, those are Northeast – Southwest (T1), North – South (T2) and Southeast – Northwest (T3). On the Northeast – Southwest (T1) stress there are four geological structures, anticline fold at ST.3 , syncline folds at ST. 13a, ST. 13b, ST. 13c and ST. 33, chevron fold at ST. 44 and joint at ST. 2. On the North – South (T2) stress there are three geological structures, those are syncline fold at ST. 35, anticline fold at ST. 54 and joints at ST. 41, ST. 46 and ST. 47. On the Southeast – Northwest (T3) stress were also three geological structures, those are chevron fold at ST 42a, overturned fold at ST. 42b, syncline fold at ST. 42c and joints at ST. 5 and ST. 34.
Evaluation Study of Boundary and Depth of the Soil Structure for Geotechnical Site Investigation using MASW A. Arisona; Mohd Nawawi; Amin E. Khalil; U K Nuraddeen; Mohd Hariri; M A Fathi
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1158.181 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.21

Abstract

This study reviews the correlation between the experimental Rayleigh dispersion curve and the Vp & Vs ground model versus depth. Six samples of stations A , B , C , D , E and F were used in the experiment.The geophone spacing used was set 1 m and total length of each line was 23 m. The result shows positive significance (best fit) of R2 that ranges from 0.80 to 0.90. The fk (frequency-wave number method) dispersion curves analysis confirmed that the soil structure investigated is divided into three zones: (1) Unsaturated soil zone (clay soil), in which the layer is dominated by soil with typically alluvial clayey silt and sand. The Vp ranges from 240 m/s to 255 m/s at a depth of 2 to 8 m. (2) The intermediate zone (stiff soil), in which the layer is dominated by sand, silt, clayey sand, sandy clay and clay of low plasticity. This structure is interpreted as partially saturated soil zone, the soil is typically very dense. It contains soft rock typically fill with cobble, sand, slight gravel and highly weathered at depth of 18 to 30 m with Vp of 255 to 300 m/s. (3) Saturated soil zone at a depth of 8 to 18 m with Vp of 300 to 390 m/s. There is a very good agreement between wave-number (k) and phase velocity (Vw) produced. Both the two parameters shows similar pattern in the topsoil and subsurface layer, which constitute boundary field of soil structure. Moreover, relationship between phase velocity versus wave-length shows best fit of model from inversion with measured value (observed) in implementation of the boundary and depth of each layer.
Effectiveness of the National Program for Community Empowerment (PNPM) for Infrastructure Development Accelerated and Geoplanology in District of Marpoyan Damai, Pekanbaru Riry Fatriadi; Febby Asteriani; Catur Cahyaningsih
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (690.881 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.30

Abstract

Since 2007 PNPM Urban realize that poverty is a structural problem and multi-dimensional. In PNPM Urban perspective , the complexity of the various dimensions of poverty -related social , political , economic , and asset . this research aim is to know the Effectiveness of the National Program for Community Empowerment for Infrastructure Development Accelerated. In this research , the authors use an explanatory survey research methods . Selected number of samples in the analysis of the effectiveness of PNPM Urban infrastructure improvements are stakeholders involved in PNPM Urban population in the research area of all stakeholders involved in PNPM Urban in District Marpoyan Damai , the authors take purposively respondents who meet the criteria and are associated with research. The results showed that increasing road infrastructure with the PNPM Mandiri. The average improvement of road infrastructure after the PNPM Urban amounted to 35.8 %. The average increase in the quality of infrastructure before the PNPM Urban program is only at 4.4 % per year . This indication shows that roads infrastructure and the quality of the road surface to be increased significantly in the presence of the PNPM Urban Marpoyan Damai in the District . From interviews with relevant stakeholders PNPM Urban, respondents said PNPM Urban was very effective against the improvement of infrastructure in District Marpoyan Damai . Respondents argue that any proposed activity in infrastructure always realized by PNPM Urban . Geological condition of study consists of alluvium Sand, Gravel, Clay, Peat Swamp, Plant Remain in Quaternary age. There are two anticline in this area that is part Western and Southern and fault inferred direction Northwest-Southeast in the middle area of research so that the topography of the area of research a bit wavy and faulted that need observation on land-use planning such as drainage, airport, residential and availability of clean water..
An Experimental Study on Effect of Palm – Shell Waste Additive to Cement Strenght Enhancement Adi Novriansyah; Novrianti Novrianti; Mursyidah U; Sepria Catur Hadiguna
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (331.486 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.33

Abstract

Enhancing the cement strength through attaching chemical additive has been popular to meet the required condition for a particular well-cementing job. However, due to a low oil-price phenomenon, pouring and additive should be reconsidered because it can raise the cost and make the project become uneconomic. Another additive material in nanocomposite form will be introduced through this experimental study. The nanocomposite material consist of silica nanoparticle, known as “Nanosilica” and a palm-shell-waste, which is abundant in Indonesia. Before making a nanocomposite, the palm-shell should be burned to obtain a charcoal form, ground and sieved to attain a uniform size. The study focuses on the two parameters, compressive strength and shear bond strength, which can reflect the strength of the cement. These values are obtained by performing a biaxial loading test to the cement sample. Various samples with different concentration of nanocomposite should be prepared and following the mixing, drying, and hardening process before the loading test is carried out. The result from the test shows a positive indication for compressive strength and shear bond strength values, according to the representative well cementing standards. Increasing the nanocomposite concentration on the cement will increase these values. Furthermore, an investigation on the temperature effect confirms that the sample with 700oC burning temperature have highest compressive-strength and shear-bond-strength values. This is a potential opportunity utilizing a waste-based material to produce another product with higher economic value.
Analyzing The Statistics Function For Determination Of Oil Flow Rate Equation in New Productive Zone Ira Herawati; Novia Rita; Novrianti Novrianti; Rosalia M Taufand
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.583 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.34

Abstract

Oil rate will be decline at production time in a well. So, we have to produce in another layer who assume have a potential. Before we produce another layer who assumed have a potential, we need to predict oil rate to known how much oil gain. In this field research oil rate prediction in new productive zone was determine following by analogical data and near well references. In this method there is a difference determine of oil rate for each people. Cause of that, in this research using analysis statistical for oil rate predicting in new productive zone based on linear function for Productivity Index (PI) and polynomial function for watercut. Determining equation of linear and polynomial functions for oil rate prediction measuring by production and logging data for each well who assumed productive zone in area X field RMT. Based of statistically analysis for linear function known that coefficient determination (r2) = 0.9964 and polynomial function known that coefficient determination (r2) = 0.9993. This result indicated that we can use both of the functions for oil rate prediction in new productive zone in area X field RMT. After that, based on both of functions calculate oil rate prediction each wells in area X field RMT. So, known differences in oil rate prediction between oil rate data in area X field Y known is 28.13 BOPD or 0.78%.
Acoustic systems (split beam echo sounder ) to determine abundance of fish in marine fisheries: Review Muhammad Zainuddin Lubis; Henry M Manik
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (473.936 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.38

Abstract

Acoustic waves are transmitted into the subsurface ocean will experience scattering (scattering) caused by marine organisms, material distributed in the ocean, the structure is not homogeneous in seawater, as well as reflections from the surface and the seabed. Estimation of fish stocks in the waters wide as in Indonesia have a lot of them are using the acoustic method. The acoustic method has high speed in predicting the size of fish stocks so as to allow acquiring data in real time, accurate and high speed so as to contribute fairly high for the provision of data and information of fishery resources. Split beam echo sounder comprises two aspects, and a transducer. The first aspect is the high-resolution color display for displaying echogram at some observations and also serves as a controller in the operation of the echo sounder. The second aspect is transceiver consisting of transmitter and receiver. The Echosounder divided beam first inserted into the ES 3800 by SIMRAD beginning of the 1980s and in 1985 was introduced to fishermen in Japan as a tool for catching up. Split beam transducer is divided into four quadrants. Factors that contribute affect the value of Target Strength (TS) fish Strength target can generally be influenced by three factors: a target factor itself, environmental factors, and factors acoustic instrument. Factors include the size of the target, the anatomy of fish, swim bladder, the behavior of orientation.
Soil Structure Evaluation Across Geologic Transition Zones Using 2D Electrical Resistivity Imaging Technique Geraldine C Anukwu; A. F. Adebara; T. K. Abodunrin; A. P. Iwakun
Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 02 : June (2017)
Publisher : UIR PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (531.789 KB) | DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.2.195

Abstract

This study utilizes the electrical resistivity values obtained using 2-D Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) technique to evaluate the subsurface lithology across different geological units. The primary objective was to determine the effect of subsurface lithology on the integrity of a road pavement, which had developed cracks and potholes at various locations. The dipole-dipole configuration was utilized and a total of nine traverses were established in the study area, whose geology cuts across both the basement and sedimentary complexes. The inverted resistivity section obtained showed significant variation in resistivity along established traverses and also across the different rock units, with the resistivity value ranging from about 4 ohm-m to greater than 7000 ohm- m. The lithology as interpreted from the resistivity section revealed the presence topsoil, clay, sandy clay, sand, sand stones/basement rocks, with varying vertical and horizontal arrangements to a depth of 40m. Results suggest that the geologic sequence and structure might have contributed to the observed pavement failure. The capability of the 2D ERI as an imaging tool is observed, especially across the transition zones as depicted in this study. The study further stressed the ability of this technique if properly designed and implemented, to be capable of providing a wealth of information that could complement other traditional geotechnical and geologic techniques.

Filter by Year

2016 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 02 (2025): JGEET Vol 10 No 02 : June (2025) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): JGEET Vol 10 No 03 : September (2025) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): JGEET Vol 10 No 01 : March (2025) Vol. 9 No. 04 (2024): JGEET Vol 09 No 04 : December (2024) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): JGEET Vol 09 No 03 : September (2024) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JGEET Vol 09 No 02 : June (2024) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JGEET Vol 09 No 01 : March (2024) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JGEET Vol 08 No 04 : December (2023) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): JGEET Vol 08 No 03 : September (2023) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JGEET Vol 08 No 02 : June (2023) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JGEET Vol 08 No 01 : March (2023) Vol. 8 No. 02-2 (2023): Special Issue from The 1st International Conference on Upstream Energy Techn Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): JGEET Vol 07 No 04 : December (2022) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022): JGEET Vol 07 No 03 : September (2022) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JGEET Vol 07 No 02 : June (2022) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JGEET Vol 07 No 01 : March (2022) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021): JGEET Vol 06 No 04 : December (2021) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): JGEET Vol 06 No 03 : September (2021) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JGEET Vol 06 No 02 : June (2021) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JGEET Vol 06 No 01 : March (2021) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020): JGEET Vol 05 No 04: December 2020 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020): JGEET Vol 05 No 03 : September (2020) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JGEET Vol 05 No 02 : June (2020) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JGEET Vol 05 No 01: March 2020 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2019): JGEET Vol 04 No 04: December 2019 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2019): JGEET Vol 04 No 03 : September (2019) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JGEET Vol 04 No 02 : June (2019) Vol 4 No 1 (2019): JGEET Vol 04 No 01 : March (2019) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JGEET Vol 04 No 01 : March (2019) Vol. 4 No. 2-2 (2019): Special Edition (Geology, Geomorphology and Tectonics of India) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 04 : December (2018) Vol 3 No 4 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 04 : December (2018) Vol 3 No 3 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 03 : September (2018) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 03 : September (2018) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 02 : June (2018) Vol 3 No 2 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 02 : June (2018) Vol 3 No 1 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 01 : March (2018) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JGEET Vol 03 No 01 : March (2018) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 04 : December (2017) Vol 2 No 4 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 04 : December (2017) Vol 2 No 3 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 03 : September (2017) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 03 : September (2017) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 02 : June (2017) Vol 2 No 2 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 02 : June (2017) Vol 2 No 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JGEET Vol 02 No 01 : March (2017) Vol 1 No 1 (2016): JGEET Vol 01 No 01 : December (2016) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): JGEET Vol 01 No 01 : December (2016) More Issue