cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
PERBANDINGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL ANTARA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN NHT PADA POKOK BAHASAN SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINIER DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KEPERCAYAAN DIRI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MAD Susanti, Vera Dewi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research are to find out, in mathematics learning for two-variable linear equation system subject matter: (1) which one providing better achievement, the CTL learning model with STAD, that with NHT or the direct learning model, (2) which one providing better achievement, high, medium or low self-confidence, and (3) in high, medium or low self-confidence, which one providing better achievement, CTL approach with STAD or NHT type or direct learning model.The population of research was the students of Junior High Schools throughout Madiun Regency in the first semester of VIII grade in the school year of 2011/2012. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling with the students of SMP Negeri 2 Dolopo, SMP Negeri 2 Kebonsari and SMP Negeri 2 Geger as the sample. The instruments used to collect the data included test to obtain the data of mathematic learning achievement and questionnaire for the on of student’s self-confidence. Technique of analyzing data used was 3x3 two-way variance analysis. From the result of analysis, it could be concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students using STAD type of cooperative learning model with CTL approach was better than that using NHT type, that using STAD type with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model, and that using NHT type with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement with high self-confidence was better than that with medium one; that with high self-confidence was better than that with low one; and that with medium self-confidence was better than that with low one. (3) Viewed from self-confidence level, the mathematics learning achievement of the students using STAD type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using NHT type, that using STAD type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model, and that using NHT type of cooperative learning with CTL approach was better than that using direct learning model.Keywords: Learning model, CTL approach STAD, NHT, , direct learning, self confidence.
POLA INTERAKSI GURU DAN SISWA TUNANETRA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SMPLB A YKAB SURAKARTA (Studi Kasus Pada Siswa Kelas IX SMPLB A YKAB Surakarta Semester Ganjil Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013) Siti Khoiriyah; Imam Sujadi; Pangadi Pangadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

with visual impairment in mathematics teaching learning on a conceptual and procedural knowledge in class IX SMPLB A YKAB Surakarta. This research was a qualitative case study, investigating deeply about the interaction of the teacher and the students in order that the interaction pattern can be described in the mathematics teaching learning. The subjects of this research were a mathematics teacher and all students of class IX SMPLB A YKAB Surakarta. The data in this study were in the form of teacher and students interactions obtained from transcriptions of the teaching learning recordings during twice observations. The transcription results were the teacher and the students’ conversations that are further reduced in order to obtain certain conversation related to the teaching learning of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Furthermore, labeling speech act and speech interaction was conducted in the conversation of conceptual and procedural teaching learning. Based on the labeling, speech interaction were categorized into three, namely: 1) speech interaction that was begun with speech act of giving information (BIn), 2) speech interaction that was begun with speech act of performing information (UIn), and 3) speech interaction that was begun with speech act of stimulating information (TIn). Each of the categories was analyzed so that the subjects that are interacting can be examined. The result of the analysis became the data of teacher and students interaction. The technique used to validate the data was time triangulation done by matching the data of the teacher and the students’ interaction taken from the first observation and the data of the teacher and the students’ interaction taken from the second observation.The results of the matching process were used to describe the interaction pattern. The findings of this research were: 1) the interaction pattern of the teacher and the students with visual impairment in mathematics teaching learning on a conceptual knowledge in class IX SMPLB A YKAB Surakarta was a two-way interaction pattern with inter-students interactions.Two-way interactionwith studentteachersis dominatedby theactivities ofthe teacherto giving information (BIN) and the performing information (TIN) to the students. While theinteractionbetween studentsis dominatedbythe activities ofthe studentsto performanceinformation(UIN). 2) the interaction pattern of the teacher and the students with visual impairment in mathematics teaching learning on a procedural knowledge in class IX SMPLB A YKAB Surakarta was a multiple-way interaction pattern (optimal result). Teacherinteractionwith studentsis dominatedby theactivities ofthe teacherto giving information(BIN), andstimulating information(TIN) to the students. Whilestudent interactionwith studentsspreadis dominated bythe performanceof information(UIN).Keywords:interactionpattern, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, mathematics teachinglearning, students with visual impairment
EKSPRIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TPS DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI POKOK SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Zamroni Zamroni; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of research was to find out: (1) which ones having better achievement, the students using TPS (Think Pair Share) learning with CTL approach or STAD (Students Teams Achievement Divisions) cooperative learning model with CTL approach or direct learning, (2) which ones having better learning achievement, the students with kinesthetic or visual or auditory learning style, (3) in each learning style, which ones having better achievement, the students using TPS (Think Pair Share) learning with CTL approach or STAD (Students Teams Achievement Divisions) cooperative learning model with CTL approach or direct learning, and (4) in each learning model, which ones having better learning achievement, the students with kinesthetic or visual or auditory learning style. The population of research was all VIII graders of Public Junior High schools in Bojonegoro Regency consisting of 55 schools. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 304 students divided into experiment I, experiment II, and control groups. The conclusions of research were: (1) TPS CTL learning provided learning achievement better than STAD CTL and direct, but STAD CTL learning provided learning achievement as same as the direct learning did. (2) The students with kinesthetic learning style had learning achievement better than those with visual and auditory learning styles. But, the students with visual and those with auditory learning styles had equal learning achievement. (3) a. In kinesthetic learning style, all learning models provided the same learning achievement. b. In visual learning style, TPS CTL learning provided learning achievement better than STAD CTL. Meanwhile, direct learning provided the learning achievement as same as the TPS CTL and STAD CTL learning models did. c. In auditory learning style, all learning models provided the same learning achievement. (4) a. In TPS CTL learning model, the students with kinesthetic learning style had better achievement than those with auditory learning style. The students with visual learning style had learning achievement equal to those having kinesthetic and auditory learning styles, b. In STAD CTL learning model, the students with kinesthetic learning style had better achievement than those with visual and auditory learning styles. However, the students with visual learning style had learning achievement equal to those with auditory learning style, c. In direct learning, the three learning styles had the equal learning achievement.Keywords:TPS-CTL, STAD-CTL, Learning Style, learning achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIRSHARE MODIFIKASI PENEMUAN TERBIMBING BERBANTUAN MICROSOFT POWER POINT PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEDISIPLINAN BELAJAR MIFTACHUL ANAS; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Suyono Suyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate: (1) which of the Modified TPS learning model, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low learning disciplines have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of the Modified TPS, TPS and conventional learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of learning discipline of the students; and (4) which of the high, medium, and learning disciplines of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Ngawi regency in the academic year of 2012/2013. The samples of this research consisted of 284 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 190 students whereas group 3 consisted of 94 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in Mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance.The result of the research are as follows: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that of the TPS and conventional learning models while the learning model of TPS is better than the conventional learning model; (2) the students with high learning discipline have a better learning achievement than those with medium and low learning discipline while the students with medium learning discipline is better than the low learning discipline; (3) in high and medium learning discipline of the students,the learning achievement achieved through the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that achieved through the TPS and conventional learning models while the learning achievement achieved through the TPS learning model is better than that achieved through the conventional learning model. However, in the low learning discipline of the students,the learning achievement achieved through the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that achieved through the TPS,andthe Modified TPS learning model is as good as the conventional learning model and the TPS learning model is as good as the conventional learning model; and (4) in Modified TPS and TPS of the learning models, the high learning discipline of the students results in a better learning achievement than the medium and low learning disciplines while the medium learning discipline results in a better learning achievement than the low learning discipline. However, in the conventional learning model the high learning discipline of the students results in a better learning achievement than the medium learning model, andthe medium learning discipline of the students are giving the same mathematics learning achievement with the low learning discipline.Keyword : Modified TPS learning model, TPS learning model, conventional learning model, learning discipline and learning achievement.
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENTS (AQ) SISWA SMA NEGERI DI KOTA MATARAM Eka Nur Azizah; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The objectives of this research are to investigate: (1) which of the cooperative learning model of NHT type with open-ended approach, the cooperative learning models of NHTtype, and the model of conventional results in a better learning achievement in mathematics of the students; (2) which of the types of climbers, the campers, and the quittersresults in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) for each category of AQ of the students, which one results in better achievement in mathematics, cooperative learning model of NHT type with open-ended approach, the cooperative learning model of NHTtype, and the model of conventional; and (4) for each learning model, which one results in better achievement in mathematics, students who have climbers type, campers, or quitters.The type of this research was a quasi-experimental with research design which used factorial 3 x 3.The population of this research was the first grade (Class Ten) of Senior High Schools in Mataram. The sample of this research was 9 classes consisted of 3 experimental classes I, 3 experimental classes II, and 3 control classes. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique.The results of the research are as follows: (1) the cooperative learning models of NHT type with open-ended approach results in a better students’ mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning model of NHTand the model of conventional, and the cooperative learning model of NHTtype results in a better students’ mathematics learning achievement than the model of conventional; (2) students’ mathematics learning achievementwith the climbers type of learning gives the same mathematics achievement as the campers type, students’ mathematics learning achievement with the campers type of learning gives the same mathematics achievement as the quitters type, and students’ mathematics learning achievement with the climbers type of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the quitters type; (3) for each category of AQ of the students (climbers, campers, and quitters), cooperative learning model of NHT type with open-ended approach results in a better students’ mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning model of NHTand the model of conventional, and the cooperative learning model of NHTtype results in a better students’ mathematics learning achievement than conventional type; (4) for each learning model (NHT type with open-ended approach, NHT type, and conventional), students’ mathematics learning achievement with the climbers type of learning gives the same mathematics achievement as the campers type, and students’ mathematics learning achievement with the campers type of learning gives the same mathematics achievement as the quitters type, and students’ mathematics learning achievement with the climbers type of learning results in a better achievement than students’ mathematics learning achievement with the quitters type.Keywords: Learning model,NHT, open-ended approach, conventional, mathematic’s learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Raodatul Jannah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

models of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students; (2) which of the high, the medium, and the low independence of learning of the students results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, students who have high, middle, or low independence of learning. This research used quasi-experimental research method. The population of this research was the eleventh (8th) grade students of the state junior high schools in Mataram in the first semester of the academic year of 2012/2013. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP Negeri 15 Mataram, SMP Negeri 8 Mataram, SMP Negeri 9 Mataram. The data of the research were collected through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data were then analyzed by using the unbalanced Two-Way Analysis of Variance at the significance level of 0.05. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the SNH type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than cooperative learning model of NHT type and conventional type, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; (2) the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning give the same mathematics achievement as the low independence of learning; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, cooperative learning model of SNH type results in better achievement in Mathematics than cooperative model NHT type and conventional type, and cooperative learning model NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning results as good as in the low independence of learning.Keywords: Cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type, realistic Mathematics approach, and independence of learning of the students
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION GUIDE NOTE TAKING (TAI GNT) DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Muhammad Gazali; Riyadi Riyadi; Mania Roswitha
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from students independence learning. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model of TAI GNT, cooperative learning model of TAI, and conventional model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the tenth grade students of senior high school at East Lombok in the first semester of the academic year 2012/2013. The size of the sample was 104 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI GNT type, 106 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI type, 105 students is given model of conventional type. The instruments used were documentation, questionnaire, and test methods. The data was analyzed using two way analysis of variance. The results of this research are as follows. (1) The TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematics learning achievement than conventional model. (2) The students with high independence learning have better mathematic learning achievement than students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning. (3) In each level of independence learning (high, medium, and low), TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematic learning achievement than conventional model. (4) In each learning models (TAI GNT, TAI and conventional), the students with high independence learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning.Keywords: cooperative learning, team assisted individualization, guide note taking, independence learning.
EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUALvDAN PENDEKATAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PADA SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA DI KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO Abdul Ghofur; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Suyono Suyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective in the research is to find out: (1) the learning approach giving better learning achievement, whether learning with contextual approach with problem solving approach or with direct learning; (2) the student learning style providing better learning achievement, whether visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning styles; (3) in each learning approach, who having learning achievement better, the students with visual, auditory or kinesthetic learning style; and (4) in each learning style, which one providing better learning achievement, the learning with contextual approach with problem solving approach or with direct learning. The population of research was all IX (ninth) graders of Junior High School in Bojonegoro Regency consisting of 55 school. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted 305 students divided into experiment I, experiment II, and control groups.The conclusion of research was: (1) the learning with contextual approach giving better mathematics learning achievement than the problem solving approach and direct learning. (2) The students with visual learning style had learning achievement better than those with auditory one. But, there was no difference of learning achievement between the students with visual and those with kinesthetic learning style and there was no difference of learning achievement between the students with auditory and those with kinesthetic learning style. (3) In learning with contextual approach, all learning styles had the same learning achievement, while in the learning with problem solving approach, the students with visual learning styles had different learning achievement, the students with visual learning style had the same learning achievment with the students with kinestetic learning styleand the students with auditory learning style had the same learning achievment with the students with kinestetic learning style. Indirect learning, there was no difference of learning achievement between the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. (4) In the students with visual,auditory and kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference of learning achievement between the students with contextual approach,problem solving approach and direct learning.Keywords: contextual, problem solving, learning style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN MOOD UNDERSTAND RECALL DETECT ELABORATE REVIEW (MURDER) PADA MATERI POKOK LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI MINAT BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMK SE KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Mustaqim, Burhan; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at knowing (1) the effectiveness of TPS, MURDER and Direct Instruction model to the students' achievement on mathematics, (2) which learning model TPS, MURDER and Direct Instruction, having better achievement on mathematics viewed from students’ interest, (3) students’ achievement viewed from students’ interest on each learning model. This research is experimental research using factorial design 3x3. The population is students of SMK on technique program in Karanganyar. Sampling is stratified cluster random sampling. The sample is 300 students, 100 is first experimental class, 100 is second experimental class and 100 is control class. Collecting data has been done through multiple choice test to know students’ achievement and questionnaire to know students interest in learning. Instrument test and questionnaire were tested before it is used to take data. Instrument validities test and questionnaire were carried out by validator, reliability test was tested by formula KR-20 and reliability questionnaire was tested with formula Cronbach Alpha while its data analysis technique uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. From the result was concluded that: (1) Students who are taught using cooperative learning model, MURDER, have better achievement than TPS and Direct Instruction. Those taught by using TPS have better achievement than Direct Instruction. (2) Viewed from students’ interest, high, mid, and low, taught by using learning MURDER have better achievement than TPS and those taught by using TPS have better achievement than Direct Instruction. (3) Viewed from learning model MURDER, TPS, and Direct Instruction, students having high interest have better achievement than those students having mid interest and students having mid interest have better achievement than those students having low interest.Keywords: MURDER, TPS, Interests Learning, Students Achievement on mathematics.
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN LANGKAH-LANGKAH POLYA DITINJAU DARIADVERSITY QUOTIENT Widyastuti, Rany; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research are to describe the thinking process of junior high school students with type of climber, camper, and quitter in solving mathematics problems based on Polya’s rule. This was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were taken by using a combined technique of stratified sampling and purposive sampling. The subjects of this research were three 9th grade student of SMP Negeri 1 Jaten Karanganyar regency, which consists of astudent with climber’s type, a student with camper’s type, and a student with quitter’s type. The data collection in this research was conducted through questionnaires and task-based interview technique whichwereused in the subject matter of two variable linear equation system.Thedata validationtechnique used triangulationof time andreferences. The data was analyzed by usingMiles and Huberman’s concept, that was data’s reduction, data’s presentation, and conclusion. The result of this research showed that (1) climber’s student used assimilation thinking process in understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer, (2) camper’s student used assimilation thinking process in understanding the problem, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer, student used assimilation and accomodation thinking process in devising a plan, and (3) quitter’s student used imperfection assimilation and accomodation thinking process in understanding the problem, student didn’t use assimilation and accomodation thinking process in devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer.Keywords: thinking process, problem solving, Polya’s rule, Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue