cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahsan Yunus
Contact Email
ahsan.yunus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
hasanuddinlawreview@unhas.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Hasanuddin Law Review
Published by Universitas Hasanuddin
ISSN : 24429880     EISSN : 24429899     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Hasanuddin Law Review (Hasanuddin Law Rev. - HALREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University. HALREV published three times a year in April, August, and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in l
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025" : 5 Documents clear
Shaping the Labor Market of Vietnam in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Comparative Insights from the European Union Pham, Hong Nhung; Tran, Thi Thuy Lam
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.5901

Abstract

The right to work has always been a fundamental right of human which was recorded in law documents. However, the recent development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created an issue that it may affect the domestic and international labor markets. In Vietnam, where over half of the population participates in the labor force, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to significantly reshape both employment dynamics and the regulatory landscape. While AI presents opportunities to create new types of employment, it simultaneously threatens to displace existing jobs, particularly among low-skilled and vulnerable workers. Despite the growing relevance of this issue, scholarly engagement with the implications of AI for Vietnam’s labor market remains sparse, especially in terms of legal and policy responses. Existing studies tend to focus on economic forecasting or technological development, with minimal attention paid to how labor laws and regulatory frameworks should evolve to address the disruptive potential of AI. This study aims to fill that gap by addressing two central questions: (1) What is the nature and extent of AI’s impact on the Vietnamese labor market? and (2) Which categories of workers are most susceptible to disruption? Through a legal-analytical and comparative approach—drawing insights from the European Union’s labor policy experience—this research offers a novel contribution to the emerging discourse on how Vietnam can construct a forward-looking and socially responsive labor regulatory framework in the age of AI. Empirical methods will be applied to examine the labor statistics of the country. At the same time, the paper will analyze the same phenomenon in the European Union and provide a solution for Vietnam. The analysis revealed that AI in the near future will have a positive effect on the workforce of Vietnam, but at the moment, workers without training are being most affected by its emergence. Thus, this study suggests that Vietnam improves its policy in labor law and social security in order to fully protect the right of all employees.
Reimagining Legal Approaches to Technology-Facilitated Violence Against Women in India Khan, Samina; Nordin, Rohaida; Hassan, Muhamad Sayuti
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.6288

Abstract

Digital technology has expanded women’s opportunities for expression and participation, while simultaneously enabling new and intensified forms of gender-based violence. In India, technology-facilitated violence against women (TFVW) has increased in scale and complexity, yet existing legal frameworks remain inadequately equipped to address its multidimensional harms. This article identifies a significant gap in Indian law, arguing that the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology Act (IT Act) insufficiently recognise psychological harm, informational privacy violations, and non-sexual online abuse, while continuing to rely on patriarchal notions of consent, modesty, and public morality. Adopting a doctrinal legal research methodology informed by feminist jurisprudence, the article examines statutory provisions, judicial interpretations, and enforcement practices governing TFVW in India. It demonstrates how current laws prioritise bodily integrity and obscenity-based regulation, thereby marginalising women’s digital autonomy and reinforcing victim-blaming narratives. Drawing on constitutional principles of equality, dignity, and privacy, the article advances a feminist legal framework that shifts the analytical focus from consent and morality to harm, agency, and structural inequality. The article contributes to feminist legal scholarship by reconceptualising TFVW as a constitutional rights violation and argues for transformative legal reform to address the systemic nature of digital violence against women.
AI Revolution: The Legal Battle Between Indonesia and the European Union to Protect Copyright from Artificial Intelligence Maddusila, Sitti Fatimah; Lanini, Agus; Purnamasari, Andi Intan
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.6499

Abstract

The global surge in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has triggered unprecedented legal complexities in copyright protection. This article examines how Indonesia and the European Union (EU) approach the challenges posed by AI driven content creation and potential copyright infringement. Through doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, this study explores regulatory frameworks, liability questions, and enforcement mechanisms in both jurisdictions. The analysis reveals that Indonesia's Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 remains anthropocentric, lacking recognition of AI generated works and mechanisms for regulating AI training using copyrighted materials. By contrast, the EU has developed a more comprehensive approach through the EU Copyright Directive and the AI Act, which incorporates risk-based AI governance and explicit opt out rights for copyright holders. The study identifies significant regulatory asymmetries between the two jurisdictions and examines potential areas for legal development. Drawing on international frameworks such as the OECD AI Guidelines, this research suggests that Indonesia could benefit from adopting more anticipatory regulatory approaches similar to the EU's principle-based strategy. The findings indicate that proactive legal reforms are necessary to address emerging AI copyright challenges in developing legal systems. This study contributes to the growing body of comparative legal scholarship on AI governance and offers insights for policymakers navigating the intersection of artificial intelligence and intellectual property law.
China–Malaysia Cross-Border Data Governance: ASEAN and Regional Legal Interactions Deng, Shan; Ab Rahman, Rozanah; Ariffin, Mariani
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.6637

Abstract

In the context of the digital economy, cross-border data governance cooperation between China and Malaysia is constrained by two factors: differences in domestic data protection laws and the lack of coherence among existing multilateral frameworks. Prior scholarship primarily examines cross-border data governance through single-treaty frameworks, while the role of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as an institutional intermediary has not been systematically analysed. In particular, institutional coordination pathways between China and Malaysia remain underexplored. The study adopts a qualitative methodology, combining textual and comparative analyses, to examine the institutional structure of the ASEAN Data Governance Framework (ADGF). It investigates ASEAN’s role in coordinating the multilateral mechanisms of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), and the China–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), where the institutional challenges in China–Malaysia cooperation are further analysed. The analysis shows that while ASEAN contributes to reducing institutional differences, its coordination mechanisms remain limited. The study therefore adopts ASEAN as an institutional coordination platform and develops a governance pathway that integrates bilateral and regional rules to examine institutional compatibility between China and Malaysia.
Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Kosovo Alidemaj, Avni H.; Maliqi, Alban; Doone, Johne; Bytyci, Valdon
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.6645

Abstract

Unprecedented violent conflicts occurred worldwide during the 20th century. Millions of lives lost, infrastructure destroyed, and generational effects on post-conflict nations. Meanwhile, international humanitarian law was developed to reduce conflict damage. Government parties to International Humanitarian Law (IHL) conventions have enforceable obligations to implement, promote, and perform their duties, helping to promote their wider recognition and enforcement. During the Kosovo conflict, Serbian military commanders and the police violated international humanitarian law by breaking fundamental precepts. The study of the Kosovo conflict prioritizes criminal accountability and historical documentation over the enduring societal consequences of violations of IHL. There are not many studies that look at how not following IHL affects transitional justice after a conflict. The findings indicate that successful post-conflict reconciliation necessitates enhanced domestic implementation and enforcement of transitional justice frameworks. This includes ensuring accountability for significant violations, fostering victim-centered truth, and institutionalizing IHL education to avert recurrence and facilitate enduring interethnic reconciliation. The article examines the major transgressions of IHL amidst the war in Kosovo (1998–1999), and their effects on post-conflict interethnic reconciliation. Utilizing qualitative, quantitative, and legal-dogmatic methods shows that non-adherence to IHL during armed conflict directly affects transitional justice and severely impacts reconciliation efforts.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025 VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025 VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2024 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2023 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2023 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2022 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2022 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2022 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2021 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2021 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2021 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2020 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2020 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2020 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2019 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2015 More Issue