Articles
324 Documents
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Werda Atas Akta Yang Pernah Dibuat Dalam Masa Jabatannya ]]>
<![CDATA[Nala Aprilia Damayanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 2 (2020): APRIL 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss2.art14
<![CDATA[This research examines how the retired public Notary is responsible for the deeds made during their term of office and how is the legal protection of the retired public Notary. This is a normative legal research with qualitative descriptive analysis. The method used is normative juridical. The result of the research shows that the Notary will still be responsible for the deed made whether the Notary is still in office or has retired. Legal protection for the retired public Notary if there is a problem with the deed that has been made includes the protection of the criminal law as referred to in Article 78 paragraph (1) number 3 of the Criminal Code, as well as in carrying out his position, the Notary must fulfill the obligations as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) of UUJN. Legal protection is provided if the deed has fulfilled the elements of clarity, truth, completeness and legality.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Terjadinya Pelanggaran Kewenangan Dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[Ratna Madyastuti]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 3 (2020): JULI 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art13
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the form of supervision carried out by the Notary Supervisory Council (MPN) on Notaries who carry out their positions to prevent violations of the authority of the Notary's office and to analyze differences in the authority of the Notary Supervisory Council and the Notary Honorary Council (DKN) in regards to the public reports suspected violations of Code of Ethics carried out by the Notary. This is an empirical juridical legal research, namely on the enactment or implementation of normative legal provisions on real behavior in every legal event that occurs in society. The results of the research conclude that the supervision carried out by the MPN to prevent violations of the notary's position is by holding hearings on notary, holding a meeting once a month attended by the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) to provide directions to implement UUJN and the Code of Ethics and MPD to pay visits to the Notary's office at least once a year to check on the Notary protocol. Whereas the Notary Code of Ethics is a regulation that applies to members of the Notary's organization, if there is a violation of the Notary's Code of Ethics, the Notary's organization through DKN is obliged to examine the Notary and hold a hearing on the examination of the violation.]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Mencegah Pelanggaran Praktik Monopoli Yang Dilakukan Oleh PT. Angkasa Pura ]]>
<![CDATA[Ovilia Shely Fadhila]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 1 (2020): JANUARI 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art8
<![CDATA[This study discusses two legal questions: first, why the airport administration carried out by PT Angkasa Pura (Persero) violates Article 50 letter a and Article 51 of Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition? Second, how are the arrangements for the implementation of airport business activities in accordance with the competition law? The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study conclude, first, the airport administration carried out by PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero) and PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero) as BUMN based on the 3 Decisions of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) violates the prohibition of monopolistic practices due to inconsistency in the behavior of business actors in carrying out business activity contract that they carry out monopolistic practices beyond the rules stipulated in the provisions of the laws and regulations. Second, the government can refer to the OECD Regulatory Impact Assessment Toolkit, which is a systemic approach to critically assess the positive and negative effects of regulation and non-regulatory alternatives related to airport administration. In addition, it is also very necessary to improve the regulations for airport business governance which are still centralistic and monopolistic in nuances.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Atas Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Sebagai Konsumen Dalam Malpraktek Di Rumah Sakit ]]>
<![CDATA[Fauji Salim]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 2 (2020): APRIL 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss2.art9
<![CDATA[Medical malpractice occurs when doctors make mistakes in fulfilling their obligations, namely providing medical services to patients, which causes civilian losses. This is often accompanied by consequences that become the elements of certain criminal acts. Therefore, this study aims to answer two problems: First, what is the normative juridical review of consumer protection for patients in hospitals? Second, how is consumer protection for patients in the event of malpractice in the hospital? This is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach, this study concludes that the purpose of running a hospital according to the Hospital Law is to provide legal certainty to patients, society and human resources, so the hospital plays an important role in monitoring every doctor's activity in carrying out his profession. so that there is no negligence that could harm the patient and the doctor himself; Meanwhile, legal protection and health services include administrative, civil and criminal aspects.]]>
<![CDATA[Peranan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pemungutan Bea Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan ]]>
<![CDATA[Jemi Grahono Suryo Gupito]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 3 (2020): JULI 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art10
<![CDATA[This study aims to, first, analyze the role of Land Deed Making Officials (PPAT) in optimizing the collection of Transfer of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) in order to achieve legal certainty in Sleman Regency. Second, identifying the obstacles for PPAT in optimizing BPHTB collection in order to realize legal certainty in Sleman Regency. This is a juridical empirical research, with a statutory approach. The results of the study conclude, first, as the vanguard of PPAT in optimizing BPHTB payments in Sleman Regency, namely providing accurate information to taxpayers about the basis for the imposition of BPHTB in accordance with the Sleman Regency Regional Regulation and appealing to prospective taxpayers to provide real information data on the amount of the sale and purchase price of land as the basis for the calculation of BPHTB tax. This is the key to creating legal certainty for the Sleman Regency government itself and taxpayers, the realization of this condition will lead optimiation of BPHTB collection in Sleman Regency. Second, obstacles come from taxpayers from taxpayer ignorance, past buying and selling transactions, to dishonesty from taxpayers in BPHTB payments. It is PPAT's duty to explain and escort taxpayers in the BPHB collection process to comply with the Sleman Regency Regional Regulation.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Operasi Tangkap Tangan Yang Dilakukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Alfin Saputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 4 (2020): OKTOBER 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art4
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to examine the implementation of hand arrest operations (OTT) carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and whether such operations go in line with the concept of hand arrest in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This is a normative research which is supported by information obtained from various sources, by utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, analyzed in a qualitative descriptive method. The results of this study conclude that the hand arrest operation carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission is in fact very effective in ensnaring the perpetrators of corruption crimes as it provides a cristal clear view on the criminal act that occurred in order to identify the suspect.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Surrogate Mother Yang Tertuang Dalam Akta Notaris Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Kenyatun Kenyatun]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 4 (2020): OKTOBER 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art15
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the legal position of surrogate mother agreement according to the Indonesiam Civil Code and Islamic law and the implementation of surrogate mother agreement made in the form of a notary deed in Indonesia. This is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach. The results of the study conclude that the surrogate mother agreement in the perspective of civil law is considered invalid because it violates the nature of the object of the agreement while the rental of uterus according to Islamic law is unlawful as confirmed in the fatwa and individual opinions based on the Qur'an. In addition, if the surrogate mother agreement is contained in a notary deed, then the deed becomes null and void.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuniar Hayu Wintansari]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 4 (2020): OKTOBER 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art10
<![CDATA[This study was conducted to determine the appropriate legal considerations in the cooking oil cartel case between the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), the District Court, and the Supreme Court. This is a normative legal research that uses statutory approach and case study. This study concludes that according to legal provisions or legal certainty in force in Indonesia, the legal considerations of the District Court are in accordance with thie principle in the cooking oil cartel case because indirect or intuitive evidence cannot be used in competition law in Indonesia. However, if it is based on the principles of justice and expediency, then the KPPU's legal considerations hence become more appropriate because KPPU has treated the wider community who have been harmed by the price of cooking oil.]]>
<![CDATA[Vaksin Covid-19 Sebagai Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Aditya Candra Pratama Sutikno]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 4 (2020): OKTOBER 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art5
<![CDATA[The legal issue that lies in the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic is contained within the scope of medical law, which is a discussion on the quality of human life in the healthcare sector. In this case, the eradication of disease, cure of disease and recovery of disease, in order to realize the maximum degree of health in the community. Efforts are taken to overcome the current Covid-19 pandemic, one of which is done through vaccination. This study further examines from a legal perspective whether the Covid-19 vaccination program can be qualified as an effort to fulfill human rights. This is a normative legal research, with a conceptual approach and qualitative analysis. This research then concludes that vaccines are widely used to prevent various diseases and help fight certain diseases, by carrying out the Covid-19 vaccine as a form of recognizing and respecting the human rights of others, the right to a decent life, safety and the right to life, and the right to sustain life]]>
<![CDATA[Kepastian Dan Perbandingan Hukum Mengenai Saham Pinjam Nama Atau Nominee Shareholder Antara Indonesia Dan Thailand ]]>
<![CDATA[Dipadary Abiyudara]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Renaissance Vol 5 No 4 (2020): OKTOBER 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art11
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to examine the legal certainty of nominee shareholder in Indonesia and the legal comparison between Indonesia and Thailand. This is a normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches. The results of this study are first, the nominee shareholder violates 6 Indonesian laws, especially the articles in UUPM No. 25 of 2007, UUPT No. 40 of 2007, and the Civil Code. Second, there are 3 driving factors for nominee shareholders, namely the presence of foreign intentions to control state assets, the complexity of licensing foreign investment, and tax issues. Third, a comparative analysis of the UUPM, UUPT, and the RI BKPM Regulation No. 1 of 2020 with the Thailand Foreign Business Act 1999 found that Thailand imposes more severe and stricter criminal sanctions and supervisory policies than Indonesia. Indonesian law still provides loopholes for nominee practice.]]>
