cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Ramadhana Alfaris
Contact Email
widyayuridika@widyagama.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
widyayuridika@widyagama.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Widya Yuridika
Published by Universitas Widyagama
ISSN : 26157586     EISSN : 26205556     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
WIDYA YURIDIKA: Jurnal Hukum, published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Widyagama Malang, as a forum of scientific publications for legal scientists and humanities who have a concentration in the field of law and human rights. Widya Yuridika published two times annually, on June and December. Each of the issue has eight articles both on review and research article.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum" : 13 Documents clear
Batasan Penegak Hukum Dalam Mengakses Data Elektronik Pribadi Eunike Briliantin Rahantoknam
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4118

Abstract

Personal data contains important information about that person. In Indonesia, there is still no beginning regarding the limitations of law enforcement in accessing personal data in the form of electronics. Only an explanation of some laws and regulations, but nothing in detail. Personal data is a person's privacy, not something that everyone can know, because it is personal, an example of personal data is ID cards. KTP is important for Indonesian citizens, because they declare themselves to be Indonesian citizens. Of course, with the development of the times, everything uses electronics, even ID cards are in electronic form, namely E-KTP. That way, people can access someone's personal data, including law enforcers who can't access someone's personal data not all of them, of course there are conditions if they want to access someone's personal data. Likewise, there is no clear provision regarding the limitations of access to personal data based on Permenkominfo 5/20 concerning Private Scope Electronic System Operators. Several statutory regulations that explain, namely the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 11 of 2008 jo. Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning information and electronic transactions and Permenkominfo 5/20. It is necessary to know that law enforcers in accessing a person's personal data must have a court decision.
Konstruksi Kewenangan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dalam Memberikan Keterangan pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi M. Adib Akmal Hamdi; Xavier Nugraha; Gio Arjuna Putra
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4255

Abstract

In the light of this background, the focus of this article is on 3 (three) issues namely: the MPR's authority to interpret the constitution, the construction of ius constitutum providing statements by the MPR in reviewing laws in the Constitutional Court, and the reconstruction of the ius constituendum model of providing information on requests for review of laws law in the Constitutional Court. This article is a legal research with a reform-oriented research type with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Based on this research, several things were found, namely: (1) the People’s Consultative Assembly has the authority to interpret the constitution based on Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (2) the construction of the ius constitutum position of the People’s Consultative Assembly in the petition for review of a law at the Constitutional Court is derogated by the exclusion of the MPR as giving explanation in Constitutional Court Law Number 6 Year 2005; (3) at the ius constituendum level, the involvement of the People’s Consultative Assembly in carrying out originalism interpretation of the constitution can be realized through the provision of explanation in a tripartite manner, namely the Government and/or the DPR as legislators and the People’s Consultative Assembly as the framers of the constitution. This article provides recommendations for the need to amend the provisions of the Constitutional Court's procedural law, so as to provide space for substantive participation for the MPR in providing an interpretation of its constitution.
Non-Fungible Token: Suatu Urgensi Serta Konstruksi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Cyndiarnis Cahyaning Putri
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4120

Abstract

The development of investment law in Indonesia, especially in digital assets, has experienced significant developments. Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is a form of digital asset that is currently widely found in the community. However, from a legal perspective, there is no regulation on NFT and how the legality of NFT transactions is related to the use of cryptocurrencies in it. Having established from the background above, this research aims to analyze the urgency of regulating NFT and how basically the legal construction of the NFT in the contract law perspective. This research is normative research using statute and conceptual approaches. The results of the study finds that the urgency of regulating the legal construction of NFT transactions in Indonesia is to provide legal certainty to investors and is related to the legality of NFT transactions in Indonesia if it is associated with the validity of cryptocurrencies. The legal construction of NFT transactions in Indonesia is that the construction is not a sale and purchase agreement, but instead the legal construction refers to exchange agreement as stated in Article 1541 BW whereas cryptocurrency and NFT here will be given extensive meaning as goods in order to comply with the provisions of Article 1320 of BW to fulfill the objective requirements, in particular, the halal cause.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Law and Society Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika, Periode Juni 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Widya Yuridika, Periode Desember, 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum More Issue