cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : 14109859     EISSN : 25808524     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art,
Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya (JDSB) adalah jurnal ilmiah yang dikelola oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Semarang (LPPM USM), jurnal ini melingkupi bidang ilmu ekonomi, bidang ilmu manajemen, akuntansi, bidang ilmu hukung dan bidang ilmu psikologi.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue " Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017" : 2 Documents clear
KAJIAN NORMATIF MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN DISCRECIONARY POWER BAGI PEJABAT PEMERINTAH DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN Mulyani, Tri; Nuswanto, A Heru; Pujiastuti, Endah
Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jdsb.v19i2.991

Abstract

Each legal state requires that in the administration of the government should be based on the legality principle of the provisions of the law, including Indonesia. However, in terms of carrying out the duties and obligations of government administration in order to provide and maintain the quality of public services and prosperity, in addition to providing guarantees and protection for citizens, it can not just stick to the principle of legality, because the day, the increasingly complex demands of public services and diverse. Problems after problems arise in the community, and in such conditions the principle that the government should not refuse to provide services to the public on the grounds there is no legislation that regulate it or not / no legislation on which the authority to do legal action . Therefore the government is given free authority to perform actions / deeds without having to be bound by legislation that is discretion. So in this study will be studied more deeply about the importance of the use of discretion for government officials in the administration. The research method used is normative juridical research type, with approach of legislation and concepts, analytical descriptive specification, data collection with literature study and will be analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the importance of discretionary power for government officials in the administration is an alternative to fill the shortcomings and weaknesses in the application of legality principle (wetmatigheid van bestuur), so that in addition to the government can protect and ensure legal certainty of citizens, the government can also provide public services and welfare for citizens.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA Juita, Subaidah Ratna; Kridasaksana, Doddy; Triwati, Ani
Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jdsb.v19i2.988

Abstract

In the criminal justice system to seek penal mediation. based on thoughts associated with ideas of reform of penal law (penal reform). The background of the criminal law reform is based on the idea of protection for victims of crime. For the victims and potential victims of pollution and / or environmental damage required is the existence of a legal device that provides protection coverage. The problem in this research is related to the aspect of legal protection to the victim of environmental crime through alternative of environmental crime case settlement outside court, that is through penal mediation in perspective of criminal law renewal. The research method used in this study is normative juridical, that is by reviewing or analyzing secondary data in the form of main legal material, by understanding the law as a set of rules or norms positive in the legislation system that regulates the victims of environmental crime life. The results show that the need for alternative settlement of environmental crime cases outside the court, as a real form of legal protection for victims of environmental crime. This means that in the perspective of reform of the criminal law, it is necessary to revise the formulation of Article 85 paragraph (2) of Law no. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, which should also be the legal basis for the settlement of TPLH out of court

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2