cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Aan Aswari
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6285341767070
Journal Mail Official
substantive.justice@umi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Published by Universitas Muslim Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25990462     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of articles published in this journal relates to topics in the fields of Adat Law, Constitutional Law, State Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, Economic Law, Medical Law and other discussions relating to Legal studies that follow our writing guidelines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 123 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
Deepfakes and Victimology: Exploring the Impact of Digital Manipulation on Victims Ali, Mahrus; Fernando, Zico Junius; Huda, Chairul; Mahmutarom, Mahmutarom
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.306

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving era of information technology, the emergence of "deepfakes" hyper-realistic digital manipulations powered by artificial intelligence has introduced complex and pressing challenges to the field of victimology. These synthetic media are increasingly used for cybercrime, online harassment, defamation, and disinformation, leading to serious psychological, reputational, and legal consequences for victims. This study employs a normative legal research method that integrates conceptual, comparative, and futuristic approaches. The conceptual approach explores the legal and psychosocial dimensions of digital victimization; the comparative approach identifies legal responses in various jurisdictions; while the futuristic approach is used to predict the trajectory of deepfake threats based on AI development trends and emerging digital behaviors. Unlike previous generalist analyses, this research provides concrete findings: it identifies four dominant forms of digital exploitation through deepfakes namely non-consensual pornography, political disinformation, financial scams, and reputational sabotage. The study also reveals that psychological trauma, reputational harm, and repeat victimization are the most pressing victimological issues in deepfake cases. By applying content analysis to real-world cases, this paper builds a framework for understanding how deepfakes transform the victim–offender dynamic, and it proposes forward-looking strategies for legal reform, victim protection, and digital literacy. This study contributes to filling the current academic gap by offering a victim-centered perspective on the legal and psychosocial consequences of synthetic media, thereby promoting more inclusive and adaptive responses in the face of evolving digital threats.
Strengthening Commercial Court Judges’ Knowledge in Handling Patent Claim Disputes: A Comparison Between Japan and Indonesia. Sulistyono, Joko; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Katagiri, Kazuaki
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.320

Abstract

This study aims to identify the substantive challenges that Commercial Court judges face when making decisions in patent claim disputes within the Indonesian Commercial Courts. These difficulties arise from the close link between patent claims and novel technological inventions. In Indonesia, However, the performance of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms for patent disputes has been underwhelming, and they do not appear poised to become the primary resolution approach. The research primarily relies on a literature review, but also includes interviews with Commercial Court judges in Central Jakarta, and Japanese Judges in Japan IP Court, and patent Examiner in Japan Patent Office, to confirm the findings. From this study, Japan's system, which involves Court Researchers and an Expert Committee, has been found to provide judges with greater confidence and expertise in handling patent disputes. The Japanese model incorporates technical experts who assist the court in understanding the complexities of patent claims and novel technological inventions, which helps the judges make more informed decisions. This paper will explore the key features of the Japanese patent litigation system and examine how they could be adapted to address the challenges faced by the Indonesian Commercial Courts.
Can Moroccan Law Ensure Substantive Justice in Protecting Private Life from AI’s Impact? Ezzerouali, Souad; Arifin, Ridwan; Banane, Mohamed Cheick
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.333

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the digital revolution and artificial intelligence (AI) on personal privacy in Morocco, within the framework of the country’s national digital strategy. As AI technology rapidly evolves, it raises significant concerns about the privacy of individuals, particularly with the unauthorized use or disclosure of personal data through algorithms. These challenges extend to various sectors, including economics, where e-commerce thrives, and politics, where AI can influence election campaigns. The research contributes to understanding how Moroccan law addresses privacy protection in the digital age. It critically reviews key legal instruments such as the Civil Code, the Consumer Protection Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the Product Safety Law, assessing their adequacy in safeguarding individuals’ rights. The study highlights the gaps in existing legislation, emphasizing the need for stronger legal frameworks to protect privacy in the face of advancing AI technologies. Key objectives of the study include assessing AI's effects on private life, evaluating the effectiveness of Moroccan laws in protecting privacy, and exploring the roles of the state and civil society in promoting legal and technical awareness. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, the research analyzes privacy protection laws in light of AI’s development. The study concludes with several recommendations: raising awareness about AI risks, enhancing existing privacy laws, and creating a comprehensive legal and technical framework that ensures stronger digital security for Moroccan citizens. These contributions aim to guide the protection of privacy and substantive justice in the era of artificial intelligence.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 123

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 7 No 2 (2024): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 1 No 2 (2018): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law More Issue