cover
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 36 Documents
Search results for , issue "Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016" : 36 Documents clear
The Level of Ca125 in Preand Postoperative of Endometriosis Asriyanti Amsir; Andi M Tahir; Nusratuddin Abdullah
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (99.852 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.436

Abstract

Objective: To determine the Ca-125 level in pre- and post-operative of endometriosis and its correlation to endometriosis stage and severity of dysmenorrhea. Method: This was a cross-sectional study design conducted at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo dan some affiliated hospitals. We took the patients undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy consecutively. Result: The mean value of preoperative Ca-125 level in stage I-II was 21.53 (SD 12.64) IU/ml vs 72.52 (SD 8.52) IU/ml in stage III-IV. The mean value of postoperative Ca-125 level was 14.82 (SD 10.00) IU/ml (stage I-II) vs 61.03 (SD 8.43) IU/ml (stage III-IV); they were significantly different (p
Incidence of PostOperative Urinary Retention after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reconstruction Elisia Elisia; Tyas Priyatini
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (106.127 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.437

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To determine the incidence of post-operative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction and associated factors. Method: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo and another associate hospital. We recruited women planned for pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction from April 2013 to April 2015. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were women with pelvic organ prolapse (2nd, 3rd and 4th degree) without prior urinary retention, drugs affecting bladder function, and history of bladder injury. After surgery, urinary catheter was applied for 24 hours. Six hours apart from urinary catheter released, residual urine was measured. Urinary retention was defined as residual urine more than 100 ml. Result: Of 200 subjects, 59 of them (29.5%) classified as having urinary retention. No association found between age, body mass index (BMI), degree of prolapse, degree of cystocele and urinary tract infection toward urinary retention. Total vagina hysterectomy + anterior colporaphy + colpoperineoraphy + sacrospinous fixation and reconstruction duration more than 130 minutes were associated with urinary retention (relative risk (RR) 3.66; 95% CI 2.91-4.60; p
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Postpartum Renny Pratiwi; Eddy Suparman; Rudy A Lengkong
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.713 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.438

Abstract

Objective: To know the incidence of stress urinary incontinence in postpartum and determine the relationship among age, parity, infant birth weight, mode of delivery, episiotomy and perineum rupture. Method: This study used cross sectional analytic design. Qualified subjects from inclusion criteria were interviewed by researchers using pre-defined MESA questioner. Subjects with stress urinary incontinence were found from the questionnaire result. The acquired data was measured and analyzed using SPSS v. 22.0 software and discussed using available literature. Result: From 162 subjects, 36 cases (22.22%) had stress urinary incontinence, 47.22% aging ? 35 years old, 72.22% had multiple pregnancies, 88.89% had per vaginal delivery. Using multivariate logistic regression test, we found there was a relationship between stress urinary incontinence with age and parity (p 35 years old and multiple parities. Keywords: multiple parities, post-partum, stress urinary incontinence
Papsmear Examination for Diagnosing PreCancer Lesion in Invisible SquamoColumnar Junction Laila Nuranna; Sulaeman Daud; Gatot Purwoto; Hariyono Winarto; Kartiwa H Nuryanto
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (105.731 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.439

Abstract

Objective: To know the concealed pre-cancer lesion in women with invisible squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) by Papsmear examination. Method: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional design starting from August 2014 to March 2015 at several Public Health Cares in Jakarta. A total of 1,682 subjects were screened by Acetoacetate Visual Inspection (AVI) examination. After the data was collected, the process was continued by verification, editing, and coding. The descriptive analysis showed the percentage of SCJ in age distribution, the percentage of AVI examination based on SCJ, and the percentage of Papsmear examination in invisible SCJ according to negative AVI result. Result: There were 1,484 (88.2%) women with the visible SCJ and 198 (11.8%) women with invisible SCJ. The percentage of invisible SCJ in the menopausal women group was 122 (61,6%); meanwhile, in the non-menopausal women group, it was 76 (38.4%). Almost half of the percentage from visible SCJ was found in menopausal women group 45.8% (103/225 women). The positive AVI result was 4 (7.1%) in the menopausal women group and 52 (92.9%) in non-menopausal women group. The result of Papsmear examination with invisible SCJ were 197 (100%) normal. Conclusion: Almost half of visible SCJ was found in menopausal women group. Most of positive AVI result was found in the nonmenopausal women group. All women with the invisible SCJ have a normal Papsmear result. Keywords: acetoacetate visual inspection, papsmear, pre-cancer lesion, squamo-columnar junction
Postradical Hysterectomy Survival Rate in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Wesley Yeremia; Max Rarung; Bismarck J Laihad
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (138.261 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.441

Abstract

Objective: Determining the survival rate of early stage cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 24 earlystage cervical cancer patients who had performed radical hysterectomy in Prof. dr. R.D. Kandou Hospital Manado during the period between January 2008 and December 2010. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to observe the survival rate. Result: The mean age of patients in this study was 47.8 (33-63) years old with a median of 45 years old. The largest proportion was less than 50 years old (66.7%) and stage IIA cervical cancer (66.7%) as the severity of cancer. Most histopathology type was the squamous cell carcinoma (50.0%). About 70.8% patients did not have lymph nodes metastasis and 62.5% patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. This study revealed that 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year survival rate were 100.0%, 100.0%, 95.8%, 83.0%, 70.8%; respectively. Conclusion: The survival rate of early stage cervical cancer afte[Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 4-3: 164-169] Keywords: cervical cancer, radical hysterectomy, survival rate
Phosphatase Regenerating Liver3 and ECadherin Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risma Maharani; Syahrul Rauf; Rina Masadah
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (812.936 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v4i3.442

Abstract

Objective: To determine the expression of Phosphatase Regenerating Liver-3 (PRL-3) and E-Cadherin in the epithelial ovarian cancer on various stages and differentiation grades. Method: This was a cross-sectional study design conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of several teaching hospitals, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Hasanuddin from January to June 2015. The expression of PRL-3 and E-cadherin was assessed immunohistochemically in 40 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer including 15 patients in early stage and 25 patients in advanced stage. We used the Fisher’s exact test with the significance of p0.05). The significant difference was found in the expression of E-cadherin whereas the high expression was shown at early stage than advanced stage (p0.05). This study also pointed out no correlation between the expression of PRL-3 and E-cadherin in epithelial ovarian cancer (p>0.05). Conclusion: PRL-3 overexpression does not decrease E-cadherin expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Keywords: E-cadherin, epithelial ovarian cancer, PRL-3

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 36


Filter by Year

2016 2016


Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue