cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
Published by Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 36 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Search results for , issue "Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017" : 36 Documents clear
The Efficacy of Monoplant® and Indoplant® as Contraceptive Methods: A Comparative Study Eka R Gunardi; Frista Ballo
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (94.583 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.526

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness, safety, and time of insertion between Monoplant® with Indoplant® to prevent pregnancy. Methods: Data were collected from November 2015 until May 2016 in Raden Saleh Clinic. A total of 153 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study and were divided into 77 patients who received Monoplant® and 76 patients received Indoplant®. The study period was 6 months. Results: The data obtained showed no significant difference in the effectiveness of both contraceptive methods. In addition, side effects such as menstrual disorders and weight gain did not differ significantly in those study groups. However, the time of insertion between Monoplant® and Indoplant® was siginificantly different (162.91 + 197.04 + 49.81 seconds versus 44.96 seconds, p<0.001). For complications such as skin irritation, inflammation, there are no differences between Monoplant® (0.0%) and Indoplant® users (0.0%). Conclusion: There are no significant differences in efficacy and side effects using Monoplant® and Indoplant® during the 6-month follow-up. However, the insertion time of Monoplant® is shorter compared to Indoplant®’s. Monoplant® can be considered for use as contraception with the effectiveness and side effects are almost the same, but with shorter time of insertion compared to Indoplant ®. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 94-98] Keywords: contraception, implant, indoplant®, monoplant®
The Impacts of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Counseling to Knowledge Level and Attitude of Pregnant Women with Gestational Age above Thirty Six Weeks in the Selection of Delivery Method Surahman Hakim; Fajar Ekaputra
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.12 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.527

Abstract

Objective: To determine the level of knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction before and after counseling in term pregnant women and knowing whether a difference a change of attitude in the selection method of delivery before and after counseling. Methods: This study design using pre - post test. At the beginning of our study provide some sort of written test to determine the initial knowledge of participants prior to the extension and the selection of the desired method of delivery. Having obtained the results of the test, followed by education about pelvic floor dysfunction. Then do the post-test to determine the level of knowledge of the subject and mode of delivery that would be pursued. The study took place between February and May 2016 in 5 Public Health Center (PHC) in Jakarta that PHC Warakas (North Jakarta), PHC Tanah Abang (Central Jakarta), PHC Cengkareng (West Jakarta), PHC Jatinegara (East Jakarta) and PHC Jagakarsa (South Jakarta). Results: A total of 102 study subjects who began the study gave the results of the pretest mean 71  10.49 (p<0.0001) and post test results of 80.725  7.7 (p<0.0001). Of the 102 subjects who began the study, there were two people who had previously chose method of delivery by caesarean section turned into vaginal. Conclusion: There is a change scores better in knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction after counseling. There was no significant difference between selecting the desired method of delivery before the after counseling. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 99-104] Keywords: fecal incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, stress urinary incontinence, uterine prolapse
Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorC Serum and Endostatin Serum as Predictors of Lympho Vascular Invasion in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Andhinna Rusmardiani; Syahrul Rauf; Efendi Lukas
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (93.671 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.529

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relationship of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors-C (VEGF-C), endostatin and the ratio of VEGF-C/ endostatin with limfo vascular invasion in patient with early stage cervical cancer. Methods: This study used a cross sectional method. Samples were all patients with early stage cervical cancer who came to the several teaching hospitals of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Universitas Hasanuddin Medical Faculty that meet the criteria, then we measured the levels of VEGF-C and endostatin. Results: We get 30 women with cervical carcinoma. The results showed that the serum levels of VEGF-C was higher in limfo vascular invasion positive (p = 0.017); the ratio of VEGF-C/ endostatin higher in limfo vascular invasion positive (p = 0.004); whereas serum levels of endostatin did not differ significantly in limfo vascular invasion positive or negative (p = 0.522). Conclusion: The level of VEGF-C and VEGF-C/ endostatin ratio was higher in patients with early stage cervical cancer with positive LVSI than negative LVSI. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 105-109] Keywords: cervix uteri cancer, endostatin, limfo vascular invasion, VEGF-C
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Human Kallikrein6, Cancer Antigen125, and Human Epididymis 4 in Predicting Ovarian Cancer Yongki Wenas; Ketut Suwiyoga; I Nyoman H Sanjaya
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (80.751 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.530

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hK6, HE4, and CA125 in predicting the malignancy of ovarian mass. Methods: The design of this study was cross-sectional. This study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, between the period of September 2014 and August 2016. Samples were all patients with ovarian tumors who underwent surgery at Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar. Data analysis was performed using McNemar and chi square test in SPSS for windows version 17.0. Results: 22 samples were obtained. P > 0.05 value of age and parity variables indicated no differences between the two groups. There is no accuracy differences (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of hK6 compared to histopathology examination in diagnosing ovarian cancer (p = 1). There is no accuracy differences (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of HE4 compared to histopathology examination in diagnosing ovarian cancer (p = 1). There is no accuracy difference (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of CA125 compared to histopathology examination in diagnosing ovarian cancer (p = 0.687). Conclusion: There was no accuracy differences (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) found between hK6, CA125, HE4 compared to histopathology examination in predicting ovarian cancer. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 110-113] Keywords: cancer antigen 125, human epididymis-4, human kallikrein 6, ovarian cancer
Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening Richard Chandra; Syahrul Rauf; Umar Malinta
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.036 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.531

Abstract

Objective: To determine the level of acceptance of self Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) examination and to compare the level of sensitivity and specificity of self HPV examination with Fluid Based Cytology on precancerous cervical lesion and cervical cancer. Methods: The analytical method used in this research was cross sectional with purposive sampling. This study is conducted at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and its affiliation from October 2014 to May 2015 with 101 subjects. The data measurement used self HPV examination tool and fluid based cytology kit. The data collected through questionnaires before and after the examination. The laboratory examination was carried out using the way of HPV Genotyping primary system (MY09/11) method Wl LTS-06, which is able to detect 35 types of HPV viruses. Results: A total of 101 subjects were involved in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the abnormal and normal group (n - 50/51). The acceptance level of self HPV examination was 62.37% (n = 63/101). Majority of subjects (88.21%) were ready to repeat the same examination in the future. The level of sensitivity and specificity for self HPV were (56% (95%CI (41.25 - 70.01%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.55 - 99.95%)), p=<0.000001, while the level of sensitivity and specificity for fluid based cytology were (40% (95%CI (26.41 - 54.82%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.35 - 99.95%)), p=0.000002. Conclusion: HPV self-testing is very potential to be used as an alternative method for cervical cancer screening. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 114-119] Keywords: cervical cancer, cervical cancer screening, human papilloma virus, sensitivity, specificity
Human Papilloma Virus L1 Gene Methylation as a Potential Biomarker for Precancerous Cervical Lesion: a Preliminary Report Suzanna P Mongan; Andrijono Andrijono; Hartono Tjahadi
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (115.068 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v5i2.532

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether HPV L1 gene methylation can be used in triage of precancerous cervical lesions. The main objective is to determine the genotype of HPV in cervical precancerous lesions and to determine the percentage, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio of DNA HPV L1 methylation in precancerous cervical lesions. Methods: A number of 57 samples of paraffin blocks (FFPE) from precancerous lesions and cervical cancer biopsies in the Department of Pathology Faculty of Medicine-Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital that had been re-evaluated by the pathologist, underwent extraction of HPV DNA. The genotypes of HPV DNA were examined using primers GP5 / 6 and specific HPV 16, HPV 18 and HPV 52 probes and analyzed by real time PCR. Sequencing was performed on samples with unknown HPV DNA type that were detected using the specific probes to determine the type of HPV. Bisulfite conversion procedure was then performed for the samples that met the inclusion criteria. Results: There were 30 samples (52.6%) with CIN 1, 12 samples (21.1%) CIN 2, 9 samples (15.8%) CIN 3 and 6 samples (10.5%) of cervical cancer. Most of the samples were 36-45 years (35.1%). Of the total 57 samples, 55 samples were successfully extracted and determined the DNA genotyping of HPV (96.5%). HPV 16 infections both in the form of single or multiple was found to be 76.36%. The samples were mostly dominated by co-infection of HPV16 and 18 (49.1%) followed by HPV 16 (24.6%) and HPV 18 (14.0%). Based on the sequencing results there were other types of high risk HPV infection found: HPV 33, HPV 35, HPV 58 and also undeterminate risk HPV 53 and low risk HPV 54. After several procedures of optimization for methylation examination of HPV DNA L1 there was thin band found in electrophoresis procedure in 8 of 42 samples (19%) of HPV 16 after bisulfite conversion but once it was purified there weren’t any band found so we can not proceed to the stage sequencing. Until now we are still in the stage of optimizing the methylation procedure. Conclusion: HPV 16 infection were most commonly found in the form of single or multiple. Co-infection of HPV 16 and 18 were found in the majority of the samples. There were no significant correlation between HPV type and the severity of cervical lesions. Until now, the examination of DNA methylation HPV L1 already obtained eight samples of HPV 16 with a thin band on electrophoresis but the result could not be concluded because it is still in the process of optimization. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 120-126] Keywords: HPV DNA genotype, L1 gene methylation, precancerous cervical lesions

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 36

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 4 October2025 Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue