cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ida Ayu Sukma Wirani
Contact Email
idaayusukmawirani@gmail.com
Phone
+6287762000445
Journal Mail Official
idaayusukmawirani@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Udayana No. 11, Singaraja, Banjar Tegal, Kec. Buleleng, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali 81116
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Bali Undiksha
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
ISSN : 26141914     EISSN : 25992627     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpbb.v6i2
Core Subject : Education,
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, the scope of this journal is in learning and instruction area which provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific researches in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching at Balinese Language Education Undiksha. The journal welcomes original empirical investigation. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in review and the selection process concerns the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction. Instruction, learning and teaching, curriculum development, learning environment, teacher education, educational, technology, and educational development at PBalinese Language Education Undiksha
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 43 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)" : 43 Documents clear
METODE DRILL KAANGGEN UTSAHA NINCAPANG KAWAGEDAN NYURAT PUPUH GINADA SISIA KELAS VIIA SMP NEGERI 2 PEKUTATAN Ni Putu Sri Partami .; Ida Bagus Putra Manik Aryana, S.S., M. .; Prof. Dr. I Nengah Martha,M.Pd .
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Bali Undiksha Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbb.v3i1.7421

Abstract

Tetilikan puniki matetujon nlatarang indik (1) Mahbahang tata titi sane anut sajeroning ngawigunayang metode drill anggen nincapang kawagedan nyurat pupuh ginada sisia kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan, (2) Mahbahang kawagedan sisia nyurat pupuh ginada sisia kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan sawusan ngawigunayang metode drill lan (3) mahbahangi penampen sisia ring kawentenan metode drill sane kanggen nincapang kawagedan nyurat pupuh ginada sisia kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan. Tetilikan puniki nganggen palihan tetilik tindakan kelas (PTK). subjek ring tetilikan puniki, sisia kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan. objek ring tetilikan puniki, metode drill. Kramaning mupulang data ring tetilikan puniki nganggen kramaning pratiaksa (observasi), Tes lan Kuesioner. Data tureksa sane kanggen inggih punika analisis data deskriptif kualitatif miwah diskriptif kuantitatif. Pikolih tetilikan puniki inggih punika (1)ngenenin indik tata titi pamelajahan ngangge metode drill sane kaanggen nincapang kawagedan sisia nyurat pupuh ginada ring kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan. Tata titi pamelajahan sane kawigunayang ring pamelajahan nyurat pupuh ginada puniki prasida nincapang kawagedan sisia nyurat pupuh ginada ring kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan, (2)wenten panincapan pikolih tes sisia sawusan klaksanayang patemuan I , skor rata-rata sisia inggih punika 73,23. Ring patemuan II, skor rata-rata sisia nincap dados 78,22. Sajeroning pamlajahan ngangge metode drill, (3) saking pikolih penampen sisia majeng metode drill ring sajeroning nyurat pupuh ginada ring pailehann I , penampen sisia beciklan pailehan II pinih becik majeng ring metode drill. Majeng guru bahasa bali mangda ngangge metode drill rikalaning ngajahin nyurat pupuh ginada. majeng ring sisia mangda setata nincapang kawagedannyane indik nyurat pupuh ginada. Kata Kunci : metode drill, nyurat, pupuh ginada This research aims to (1) what are the steps appropriate to us drill methodsto improve writing skills Pupuh Ginada class VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan, (2) is drill method can be used to improve te ability to write Pupuh Ginada class VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan, (3) how do students with their drill methods are used to improve the ability to write Pupuh Ginada clas VIIA SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan. This study uses classroom action research design. The subjects were students SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan. The object of this research is the method drill. Data were analyzed using descriptive data analysis techbiques and technical amalysis of qualitative and quatitative data. The result showed that, (1) appropriate measures using drill method is expected to improve the students SMP Negeri 2 Pekutatan in writing Pupuh Ginada, (2) an increase in the value of the students after the first meeting with an average total score of 73,23 and was followed by a second meeting with average score of 78.22 when learning to write Pupuh ginada using drill, (3) from the students opinions about the drill methods in the learning process, the first meeting studens response was good and the second meeting of student reponse was very good about the drill method.keyword : Methods drill, writing, Pupuh Ginada
SESELEH TES OBJEKTIF AKHIR SEMESTER GANJIL BASA BALI KELAS XII SMA NEGERI 2 SINGARAJA 2015/2016 SAKING PARINDIKAN SEBARAN KOGNITIF, VALIDITAS LAN RELIABILITAS, MIWAH KONSTRUKSI OPTION I Putu Widhi Astika .; Drs.I Wayan Wendra,M.Pd .; Dra. Sang Ayu Putu Sriasih,M.Pd .
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Bali Undiksha Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbb.v3i1.7422

Abstract

Tetilikan puniki matetujon nlatarang indik (1) sebaran kognitif, (2) validitas lan reliabilitas, miwah (3) konstruksi option tes objektif akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. Palihan tetilik sane kaanggen inggih punika deskriptif kuantitatif. Jejering tetilik puniki marupa tes objektif akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. Panandangnyane inggih punika sebaran kognitif, validitas lan reliabilitas, miwah kontruksi option. Tetilikan puniki nganggen sampel sane kaambil nganggen tabel bilangan random antuk akehnyane sampel 60. Duaning asapunika, data sane kabuatang kapupulang nganggen kramaning dukomentasi miwah piranti kartu data. Data-data inucap katureksa nganggen statistik deskriptif miwah inferensial. Pikolih tetilik nyinahang sebaran kognitif tes akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 nenten maimbang (proporsional) inggih punika 17,5% C1, 30% C2, 25% C3, 7,5% C4, 5% C5, miwah 15% C6. Validitas lan reliabilitas tes inucap madue kautaman sedeng sane kacihnayang saking pikolih pawilangan ngamolihang koefisien validitas 0,599 miwah koefisien reliabilitas 0,603. Sakewanten saking parindikan konstruksi option, tes inucap madue kautaman sane pinih becik antuk rerata 96,88. Malarapan saking pikolih tetilik punika nyihnayang tes akhir semester ganjil kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 kautamannyane patut katincapang antuk ngamecikang malih tes inucap.Kata Kunci : seseleh tes objektif basa Bali This research have function for describe (1) cognitivism (2) validity and reliability (3) construction option objective test in last odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. The method used in this research is quantitative describe. The subject of research is objective test in last odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. The object is: cognitivism, validity and reliability, and construction option. This research used samples the take from random number table with 60 samples. Therefore data collection do used documentation method with data card instrument. Analisys data used describe statistic and inferential. Result of research show that distribution cognitivism last semester test Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 not balanced there are: 17,5% C1, 30% C2, 25% C3,7,5% C4, 5% C5, and 15% C6. That validity and realibity have good quality the show from result calculation get validity coefficient 0,599 and realibity coefficient 0,603. But terms contruction option, that test has better quality with score average 96,88. Based of that research show the last test in odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 has quality thea must upgraded with method doing revision of that test.keyword : analisys objective test balinese language
SESELEH TES OBJEKTIF AKHIR SEMESTER GANJIL BASA BALI KELAS XII SMA NEGERI 2 SINGARAJA 2015/2016 SAKING PARINDIKAN SEBARAN KOGNITIF, VALIDITAS LAN RELIABILITAS, MIWAH KONSTRUKSI OPTION I Putu Widhi Astika .; Drs.I Wayan Wendra,M.Pd .; Dra. Sang Ayu Putu Sriasih,M.Pd .
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Bali Undiksha Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbb.v3i1.7424

Abstract

Tetilikan puniki matetujon nlatarang indik (1) sebaran kognitif, (2) validitas lan reliabilitas, miwah (3) konstruksi option tes objektif akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. Palihan tetilik sane kaanggen inggih punika deskriptif kuantitatif. Jejering tetilik puniki marupa tes objektif akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. Panandangnyane inggih punika sebaran kognitif, validitas lan reliabilitas, miwah kontruksi option. Tetilikan puniki nganggen sampel sane kaambil nganggen tabel bilangan random antuk akehnyane sampel 60. Duaning asapunika, data sane kabuatang kapupulang nganggen kramaning dukomentasi miwah piranti kartu data. Data-data inucap katureksa nganggen statistik deskriptif miwah inferensial. Pikolih tetilik nyinahang sebaran kognitif tes akhir semester ganjil basa Bali kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 nenten maimbang (proporsional) inggih punika 17,5% C1, 30% C2, 25% C3, 7,5% C4, 5% C5, miwah 15% C6. Validitas lan reliabilitas tes inucap madue kautaman sedeng sane kacihnayang saking pikolih pawilangan ngamolihang koefisien validitas 0,599 miwah koefisien reliabilitas 0,603. Sakewanten saking parindikan konstruksi option, tes inucap madue kautaman sane pinih becik antuk rerata 96,88. Malarapan saking pikolih tetilik punika nyihnayang tes akhir semester ganjil kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 kautamannyane patut katincapang antuk ngamecikang malih tes inucap.Kata Kunci : seseleh tes objektif basa Bali This research have function for describe (1) cognitivism (2) validity and reliability (3) construction option objective test in last odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. The method used in this research is quantitative describe. The subject of research is objective test in last odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016. The object is: cognitivism, validity and reliability, and construction option. This research used samples the take from random number table with 60 samples. Therefore data collection do used documentation method with data card instrument. Analisys data used describe statistic and inferential. Result of research show that distribution cognitivism last semester test Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 not balanced there are: 17,5% C1, 30% C2, 25% C3,7,5% C4, 5% C5, and 15% C6. That validity and realibity have good quality the show from result calculation get validity coefficient 0,599 and realibity coefficient 0,603. But terms contruction option, that test has better quality with score average 96,88. Based of that research show the last test in odd semester Balinese language twelve class in SMA Negeri 2 Singaraja 2015/2016 has quality thea must upgraded with method doing revision of that test.keyword : analisys objective test balinese language

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 43

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022) Vol 9, No 1 (2022) Vol 8, No 2 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021) Vol 8, No 1 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021) Vol 7, No 2 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 1 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JPBB Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 1 (2019): JPBB Vol 5, No 2 (2018): JPBB Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): JPBB Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): JPBB Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017) Vol 4, No 1 (2017): JPBB Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016): Vol. 5 No. 3 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014) More Issue