cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
International Journal of Social Science and Business
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
ISSN : 26146533     EISSN : 25496409     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
International Journal of Social Science and Business (IJSSB) is an open access, peer-reviewed and refereed journal published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha), Indonesia. The main objective of IJSSB is to provide an intellectual platform for the international scholars. IJSSB aims to promote interdisciplinary studies in Businnes and social science and become the leading journal in Businnes and social science in the world.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 913 Documents
 88   89   90   91   92 
What Makes Tourists Go Green? An fsQCA Approach to Sustainable Behavior in Yogyakarta’s Heritage Tourism Nur Rohman; Amin Kiswantoro; Dwiyono Rudi Susanto; Supina Supina
International Journal of Social Science and Business Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ijssb.v9i4.102382

Abstract

Tourism’s rapid growth in Southeast Asia, particularly in heritage destinations such as Yogyakarta, Indonesia, has intensified concerns regarding environmental sustainability. Understanding why tourists engage in pro-environmental behavior remains a critical yet complex challenge for destination managers and policymakers. This study adopts a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to uncover configurations of psychological, situational, and contextual conditions sufficient for green behavioral intention (GBI) among domestic tourists. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Value-Belief-Norm Theory (VBN), and Social Practice Theory (SPT), the study operationalizes five antecedent conditions: ecological attitude (ECOATT), environmental infrastructure perception (ENVINFRA), community engagement visibility (LOCALENGAGE), perceived government support (GOVTSUPPORT), and social media sustainability influence (SOCMEDINFLU). Data were collected via structured questionnaires administered to 400 domestic tourists at key heritage sites in Yogyakarta. Results reveal no single necessary condition for high GBI; instead, six distinct sufficient configurations were identified, grouped into two solution families: (i) motivational–infrastructure synergy, where strong ecological attitudes and digital social influence interact with supportive infrastructure, and (ii) compensatory governance, where policy visibility and infrastructure substitute for weak individual motivation. The overall result demonstrates strong explanatory power, with a solution consistency of 0.823, indicating that the identified configurations account for 82.3% of cases with high GBI, and a solution coverage of 0.597, capturing 59.7% of all high-GBI cases. These findings demonstrate equifinality and causal asymmetry in sustainable tourist behavior, challenging additive assumptions in traditional behavioral models. The study contributes theoretically by extending TPB and VBN frameworks with non-linear, context-sensitive pathways, integrating SPT to explain collective digital and material cues. Practically, the results provide evidence-based recommendations for infrastructure investment, social media campaigns, and policy enforcement to foster sustainability in heritage tourism destinations facing overtourism pressures.
Factors Influencing Sustainable Destinations: A PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review I Gusti Agung Sasih Gayatri; I. G. A. Ketut Giantari; Tjokorda Gde Raka Sukawati; Gede Suparna
International Journal of Social Science and Business Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ijssb.v9i4.104352

Abstract

The study seeks to build a holistic and evidence-based understanding of how multiple interrelated factors jointly shape sustainable tourism destinations worldwide. Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest searches were used in this systematic literature review, along with a PRISMA-guided snowballing technique. 32 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 were found during the review. According to the findings, a complex and multifaceted combination of elements pertaining to visitors, organisation and management, social and community factors, environmental and ecological factors, and destination experiences and attractions all have an impact on sustainable destination development. Sustainability can only be attained by a combination of interconnected elements, aided by cooperation from visitors, managers, legislators, and local communities. By combining empirical data from various contexts and providing useful suggestions for enhancing destination management, policy creation, and community empowerment, this study advances theory. The synthesis offered in this review contributes significant academic value while delivering practical guidance for stakeholders seeking to design more effective and context-responsive strategies for achieving destination sustainability. Future research is suggested to adopt longitudinal and mixed-method approaches, explore simultaneous factor interactions, and expand geographical coverage to enrich global perspectives on sustainable destinations.
Integrated Zakat Governance Model in Malaysia: Lessons for Zakat Management Reform in Indonesia Based on Efficiency Analysis and Mixed-Methods Agus Taruno; Muhammad Said; Rizqon Halal Syah Aji; Rini Rini
International Journal of Social Science and Business Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/ijssb.v9i4.107374

Abstract

This study aims to identify best practices of Malaysian integrated zakat governance that can be transferred to Indonesian zakat management reform. This study compares zakat governance in Malaysia and Indonesia using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design that combines quantitative DEA analysis and NVivo qualitative analysis. The results show that Malaysia achieves 3.2 times higher efficiency through an integrated institutional structure, strong fiscal incentives (including direct tax deductions), and a mature digital infrastructure. The collection of zakat per muzaki in Malaysia reached Rp 9.2 million, compared to Indonesia at Rp 226 thousand, indicating a substantial difference in individual-level contribution. The research develops an Integrated Zakat Governance Model (MTKZ) for Indonesian reform, featuring a federal-coordinated architecture, fiscal reform, integrated digital platforms, and professionalization of human resources. The findings challenge the assumption that zakat management effectiveness depends solely on demographic and religious factors, demonstrating that institutional governance architecture is a critical determinant.

Page 92 of 92 | Total Record : 913

 88   89   90   91   92 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): May Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): February Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): November Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): August Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): May Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): February Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): November Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): August Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): May Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): February Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): November Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): August Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): May Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): February Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): November Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): August Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): May Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): February Vol 6, No 1 (2022): February Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): November Vol 5, No 3 (2021): August Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): August Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): May Vol 5, No 2 (2021): May Vol 5, No 1 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): February Vol 4, No 4 (2020) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2020): November Vol 4, No 3 (2020) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020): August Vol 4, No 2 (2020) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): May Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): February Vol 4, No 1 (2020) Vol 3, No 4 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): November Vol 3, No 3 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): August Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): May Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): February Vol 2, No 4 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): November Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): August Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): May Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): February Vol. 1 No. 4 (2017): November Vol 1, No 4 (2017) Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): August Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): May Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): February Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue