cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum dan Pencegahan Tindakan Pengerusakan dalam Lingkup Pariwisata Berdasarkan dari Asas Good Governance Josep Kusumo, Lexandru; Tiopan, Demson
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1414

Abstract

Destructive actions can be categorized as vandalism. This destructive action is common in tourism areas. Tourism is an important sector of national economic development. The tourism sector faces challenges in the form of acts of vandalism on public facilities that result in losses for the tourism sector and indicate the existence of social diseases in Indonesia. This problem is important to be addressed through law enforcement and prevention efforts in accordance with the principles of good governance because the lack of government supervision in terms of order has caused problems in the form of a social disease called vandalism which is rampant in tourism sites. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research to examine legal prevention and efforts to prevent this act of vandalism in terms of the principles of good governance. The method used for this research is the normative juridical method in which the research focuses on positive legal norms written in and the Criminal Code (KUHP) relating to sanctions. The purpose of this research is to find out whether law enforcement and prevention of acts of destruction in the tourism environment are in accordance with the principles of good governance. The form of sanctions against the perpetrator is regulated in the Criminal Code. One of the efforts that can be made to reduce this act of destruction in accordance with the principles of good governance is to facilitate these street artists to help the government beautify tourism in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Pengguna Mobile Banking Sebagai Korban Kejahatan Melalui Internet Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Ivanca, Eveline; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1423

Abstract

Information technology can be used to commit a wide variety of crimes, including online gambling, automated teller machine theft, corporate data theft, and fraud through electronic media. As victims of fraud crimes often lack access to legal assistance and receive little attention from the criminal justice system as a whole - especially in terms of human rights - laws are therefore needed to control them. The author concludes that Article 28 paragraph (1) of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law and Article 378 of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law regulate in terms of positive law regarding the legal protection of mobile banking users as victims of internet crimes. Article 378 of the Criminal Code, which provides legal protection to consumers of M-Banking users against potential losses, is evident in the Law on the protection of witnesses and victims, a special regulation relating to the protection of victims. Even so, witness and victim protection laws offer protection to victims from illegal activities that place witnesses and victims in dangerous situations that could endanger their lives. Electronic information and technology laws offer protection to suspects and defendants through case resolution and criminal sanctions; in contrast, the criminal procedure code protects victims through the right to report, the right to organize public prosecutors, and the right to combine criminal and civil prosecutions to obtain compensation.
Permasalahan dari Adanya Ketidaksesuaian Harga yang Tertera Pada Transaksi Akta Jual Beli (AJB) dengan Harga Transaksi Sesungguhnya Kurniawan, Stanley; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1424

Abstract

In transferring rights to land and buildings by way of sale and purchase, the requirements for the formation of an agreement are sufficient based on the agreement between the parties and an agreement. Article 1320 of the Civil Code explains the conditions for the validity of an agreement. In the process, the transfer of land rights is carried out by prioritizing the principles of light and cash, if an agreement has a defect in the subject, the agreement can be canceled, while there is a defect in the object, it is null and void. PPAT plays an important role as an authorized official in making a Sale and Purchase Deed, in this case PPAT is responsible for the product it has made and its making must be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. If a PPAT commits an act that is not in accordance with the applicable regulations, there are legal consequences that will become a problem in the future. The type of research used is normative. To support this research, the author uses a literature study type of research, which examines several documents related to this research. The method in this research is a normative method with a statutory approach. The research data shows how the problem of the price discrepancy in the Sale and Purchase Deed with the actual price.
Legalitas Skb Tentang Pedoman Implementasi Pasal Tertentu dalam UU ITE Ditinjau dari UU Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Julita, Marcella; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1425

Abstract

The SKB ITE was established as a guideline for the implementation of specific articles within the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) that were deemed inherently confusing in their execution. However, the legality of the SKB ITE remains a current issue, particularly concerning its issuance procedures and status. This research employs a normative legal research approach. The findings indicate that SKB ITE serves as an implementation guideline for the UU ITE that lacks a legal basis and violates the Law on Legislation Formation, as its establishment does not conform to the prescribed mechanisms, thus SKB ITE must be declared null and void. Nonetheless, a subsequent issue arises regarding the divergent interests between legislators, regulatory observers, and all of whom are demanding amendments to the UU ITE. Considering the invalidity of the SKB ITE, the most appropriate course of action would be to revise the UU ITE by incorporating the substantive aspects outlined in the SKB ITE and aligning it with the provisions of cybercrime in the New Indonesian Criminal Code. Through these changes, the need for a implementation guideline for the UU ITE can be addressed, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of its implementation and reducing societal controversies surrounding it
Kekuatan Hukum Akta Hibah Atas Tanah dan Bangunan Menurut Hukum Perdata (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 236/PDT/G/2022/PN. BKS) Kurniawan, Kevin; Tanawijaya, Hanafi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1426

Abstract

In making grants of land and buildings according to civil law, it is regulated in the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) article 1666 which states that a gift is an agreement where the donor gives a gift while still alive to the recipient of the gift free of charge and cannot be withdrawn. return, hand over an object for the purposes of the recipient of the gift who receives the delivery of the object, in general to make a gift of land and buildings by making a deed of gift to the PPAT, the making of this deed of gift is attended by the parties, in this case the giver and recipient of the gift and witnessed by at least 2 (two) witnesses who meet the requirements, then the grant deed is registered at the Land Office, pays taxes, namely Income Tax (PPh) and BPHTB on the grant, then transfers the name of the certificate to the Land Office based on the grant. The type of research used in this research is normative. To support this research, the author used a library research type of research, which examined several documents related to this research. The method in this research is a normative method with a statutory regulatory approach. Research data shows the strength of the Deed of Grants for Land and Buildings According to Civil Law (Case Study of Bekasi District Court Decision Number 236/PDT.G/2022/PN.BKS).
Analisis Terhadap Alasan Memperingan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3287 K/PID.SUS/2019 Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1427

Abstract

Enforcement of criminal law at the examination stage in court hearings plays a crucial role in SPP. The court decision is the end of this stage. The heart of a court decision is the judge's legal considerations and ruling. The judge's legal considerations explain why his decision was such. One thing that is often included in the judge's legal considerations is the reason for mitigation which is the cause of the judge's decision regarding the sentence being reduced. In practice, the judge's legal considerations and rulings are not always in line with the Supreme Court's cassation decision Number 3287 K/Pid.Sus/2019. The type of research in this writing uses normative legal research, a type of secondary data with a library research method which is then analyzed using qualitative methods and drawing conclusions deductively. The reasons for mitigation in the court's decision are manifested in the judge's legal considerations. For reasons of mitigation, the judge handed down a lighter sentence to the defendant. The verdict, which carries a lighter sentence, is given by the panel of judges by including the reasons for mitigation in the legal considerations so that the Ratio Decidendi is created, and the decision can be justified. Article 95 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law states that judges who make mistakes in deciding cases can receive punishment in the form of administrative sanctions in accordance with statutory provisions. In practice, in the Supreme Court's cassation decision Number 3287 K/Pid.Sus/2019, the panel of judges gave a lighter sentence decision than the public prosecutor demanded but did not explain the reasons for mitigation in their legal considerations, on the contrary what was explained was the reasons for aggravation, even though this is required in Law on Judicial Power to judges. Thus, the decision is contrary to the law, materially flawed and cannot be held accountable by the panel of judges because it does not present the Ratio Decidendi which is the mandate of Article 8 paragraph (2) of the Judicial Power Law that in considering the severity and severity of the crime, the judge must be obliged to clearly see the nature of the crime. good and bad of a defendant.
Pemberian Insentif Fiskal dan Non Fiskal Serta Menjamin Kepastian Hukum dalam Rangka Mengundang Investasi Asing di Indonesia Mamuk Djais, Yan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1428

Abstract

Kesejahteraan seluruh rakyat Indonesia merupakan cita-cita seluruh bangsa Indonesia. Salah satu cara untuk mewujudkan cita-cita luhur tersebut adalah dengan memaksimalkan seluruh sumber daya alam dan manusia yang ada, didukung oleh aspek permodalan yang kuat, pengetahuan yang maju, dan peralatan yang berteknologi tinggi. Untuk memaksimalkan potensi tersebut, diperlukan peran serta investor asing dalam pengolahan sumber daya alam, transfer ilmu pengetahuan, dan penyediaan fasilitas produksi berteknologi tinggi. Namun penanaman modal asing langsung di Indonesia harus dilakukan dalam bentuk pendirian perusahaan patungan antara penanam modal asing dan penanam modal nasional, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal. Di sisi lain, untuk mengundang investor asing diperlukan kemudahan dan kenyamanan berinvestasi, seperti keringanan dan/atau pengurangan pajak, potensi keuntungan bagi kedua belah pihak, dan tentu saja aturan hukum yang jelas dan adil bagi investor asing. Sehingga investor asing tertarik untuk menanamkan modalnya di Indonesia. Dengan begitu, keuntungan besar bisa diraih pemerintah Indonesia untuk membawa kesejahteraan bagi seluruh bangsa Indonesia.
Tinjauan Hukum Mengenai Upaya Pencegahan Investasi Bodong di Internet Maliki Sudrajat, Muhammad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1429

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyelidiki lanskap investasi digital, dengan fokus pada kerentanan investasi online terhadap aktivitas penipuan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang landasan hukum dalam berinvestasi, bertujuan untuk memahami perlindungan hukum yang diperlukan bagi investor di era digital. Dengan kemajuan teknologi, investasi online menjadi lazim, membawa tantangan dan risiko terkait praktik penipuan. Dalam konteks investasi online, kemudahan akses juga menarik skema penipuan. Kasus yang melibatkan seorang mahasiswa yang berhasil menipu 338 investor dengan skema investasi valuta asing menggambarkan seriusnya permasalahan ini. Untuk melindungi investor dari risiko yang terkait dengan investasi online, perlindungan hukum sangatlah penting. Kerangka hukum yang ada, seperti UU Pasar Modal dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), harus memberikan kejelasan mengenai kompensasi kerugian. Meskipun ada upaya yang dilakukan BKPM dan OJK, investasi online yang curang masih tetap ada, sehingga memerlukan eksplorasi strategi pencegahan secara menyeluruh. Studi ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman tentang aspek hukum investasi online dan upaya berkelanjutan untuk melindungi investor. Melalui kajian yang komprehensif, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesadaran akan perlindungan hukum yang dibutuhkan masyarakat dalam ranah investasi digital.
Urgensi Moratarium Terhadap Perjanjian Peningkatan dan Perlindungan Penanaman Modal (P4M) Terkhusus pada Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa yang Merujuk pada International Centre For The Settlement Of Investment Dispute (ICSID) Fahlevy, Syahrizal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1430

Abstract

This study discusses agreements regarding various issues that arise in connection with the Enhancement and Protection of Foreign Investment (P4M) as agreements that encourage protection against capital restrictions, but often cause lawsuits that can cause losses from the Indonesian side. Therefore, it is necessary to have a P4M moratorium so that Indonesia needs to review clauses that are detrimental to Indonesia and carry out renegotiations with foreign parties. In the event that a dispute arises between Indonesia and foreign investors, it can be resolved through The International Center for the Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) by taking into account the interests of Indonesia. This research was conducted in a juridical-normative way with a literature study.
Legal Implications of APHT Registered by PPAT More Than 7 (Seven) Working Days Martini, Martini; Takdir, Takdir; Muhammad Arif, Firman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1431

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal implications of APHT registered by PPAT for more than 7 (seven) working days at the Luwu Regency Land Office. This research was conducted using Normative research methods. The data obtained, both primary data and secondary data, are categorized according to the type of data. The results of this research show that late registration of the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) will affect the birth time of the Mortgage Rights thereby causing losses for the parties, based on Article 23 paragraph (1) Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights, Officials Land Deed Makers (PPAT) will be subject to administrative sanctions, in the form of: verbal warning; written warning; temporary dismissal from office; dismissal from office. The guarantee itself provides legal protection for creditors. 4) Late registration of the Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) does not cause the deed to be null and void.

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue