cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yoga Suharman
Contact Email
yoga.shrmn@amikom.ac.id
Phone
+62274-884201
Journal Mail Official
journalnationstate@amikom.ac.id
Editorial Address
Building VI.3.2 Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta Jl. Ringroad Utara, Condongcatur, Depok Sleman, Yogyakarta, 55283
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Nation State : Journal of International Studies
Published by Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta
ISSN : 2620391X     EISSN : 2621735X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v4i1
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Nation State: Journal of International Studies (NSJIS) is a scientific publication under management of International Relations Department, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta in collaboration with Asosiasi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Indonesia (AIHII). The journal aims to facilitate the exchange and dissemination of ideas and research in the field of International Relations. The scope of this journal consist of Global Political Economy; Diplomacy and Foreign Policy; Globalization and Global Civil Society; Global Governance; Regional and International Security; or The other topic related to international studies.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations" : 6 Documents clear
Inequity in International Climate Change Negotiations Nanda, Serge Silatsa; Samba, Omar; Sahide, Ahmad
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.444

Abstract

The adoption of international climate agreements requires thorough negotiation between parties. This study aims to analyse the inequities between developed and developing countries in climate negotiations. This was done through a scrutiny of the main stages of these negotiations from the Rio Conference to the advent of the Paris Agreement. Our analysis has shown pervasive inequities along the climate negotiations over time. The UNFCCC made a qualitative separation between developed and developing countries in the principle of common but differentiated responsibility. Furthermore, the Kyoto Protocol emphasized this with the commitment of developed countries to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 5%. The Kyoto Protocol by introducing flexibility mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) contributed to increase inequalities. The Paris Agreement has increased inequity by requesting each country to submit nationally determined contributions (NDCs) even though the global emission of developing countries remains very low. The negotiation style of developing countries is mostly limited to compromise and accommodation to the desires of the powerful states, as is the case in most international cooperation. The reality of the climate change negotiations mirrors the inequalities between developed and developing nations.
How Does Japan Perceive China as an Adversary? The Dispute in Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Prabowo, Muhammad Arif
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.497

Abstract

A China-Japan grim relationship has been marked by conflicts, and other political security tensions for a long time. One of which is the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands dispute occurring since 2012, it will become an issue for both countries that is difficult to be ironed out. The dispute has occurred since the Japanese government nationalized the islets, which China also claimed. It led to both countries' expansion of military power and a clash in East Asia. This essay aims to analyze how Japan perceives China by focusing on the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands dispute. This article argues Japan perceives China as a threat due to China’s military penetration over Diaoyu/Senkaku islands leading to a strategic distrust of Japan and its uncertain behavior as an international relations actor led to a moral distrust of Japan. This phenomenon will likely raise the tension in the region and enhance the escalation possibility due to the security dilemma effect.
The Strategy of Power Politics of the Philippines in Facing China in the South China Sea Conflict Imanuddin, Ahmad Fauzi; Sugito, Sugito
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.526

Abstract

The South China Sea conflict has involved many parties, including the Philippines. In defending one of the most strategic islands, the Spratly Islands, the Philippines has exerted its hard power by increasing its military power strategy. By engaging the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and working with the U.S., the Philippines can increase its military power. The prior studies have only explored how the dispute in SCS is caused by maritime growth, and some have found the effective way to solve the issue is from the liberal perspective. This study uses a power politics approach to the Philippines' strategy to defend the Spratly Islands and its surroundings in the South China Sea dispute. It analyzes the Philippines' interests in the Spratly islands. The research was conducted using qualitative methods through literature study, and the data were analyzed, then described to obtain a complete picture of the answers to the problems studied. This finding explores how the Philippines' defense strategy works and how it is generated. The results of this study indicate that the defense strategy in the Spratly Islands is generated by the national interests of the Philippines, especially in the economic field.
India’s Withdrawal from Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Wicaksono, Abraham Hugo Pandu
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.571

Abstract

The Sino-US competition in the Indo-Pacific has become a central issue in international relations and how the competition of both countries affects state behavior. This article attempts to provide explanations of India's behavior in deciding to leave the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement by using the neoclassical realism theory. Neoclassical realism believes that the actors' behavior is influenced by the constellation of international structures and domestic constellations. India's exit from RCEP was influenced by structural changes in the Indo-Pacific region, with the loss of China's balance of power marked by the withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Moreover, the condition has been exacerbated by the pressure received by Narendra Modi at the domestic level with the emergence of rejection of India's involvement in RCEP. It has influenced Narendra Modi's perception, who was active in the region with the two factors above, decided to resign from RCEP.  
How COVID-19 Pandemic Bolsters China’s Influence Toward Hegemonic Race In ASEAN? Rusli, Andi Ibnu Masri
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.587

Abstract

The Covid-19 outbreak that occurred at the end of 2019 added to a long series of global crises at a time when the trade war was still ongoing. The epidemic then quickly spread throughout the world. Southeast Asia is no exception. The presence of this epidemic in Southeast Asia adds to the intensity of the struggle for hegemony between the United States and China. Vaccine diplomacy from China, the United States, and ASEAN itself presents its own dynamics for the competition for hegemony in this region from the two countries. This paper uses a qualitative method approach, where the author presents a critical review of the current dynamics. While the theoretical basis, the author uses the theory of hegemony through non-traditional security approach instruments centered on the vaccine diplomacy competition conducted by two superpower countries. The results show how the dynamics of the superiority of China's vaccine diplomacy are important points and provide broad projections of a new chapter in the struggle for hegemony in Southeast Asia.
Global Eclectic Treatment of Covid-19: Global, Regional, and National Perspectives on Common Enemy Anadza, Hirshi; Pasopati, Rommel Utungga; Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.596

Abstract

After being called the UN's, COVID-19 has become a global common enemy today. The escalation of the pandemic has been responded to nationally, regionally, as well as globally. However, the efforts of the United Nations as the most significant international organization are interpreted differently at the regional and national levels. That way, there will be a gap in understanding between the handling of COVID-19 at the global, regional, and national levels. Therefore, this paper discusses further how the COVID-19 as a common global enemy is reflected in regional and national actions against this pandemic? The global eclectic theory is explored to explain how global concepts relate to more specific concepts. Comparing the COVID-19 handling policies in ASEAN, SAARC, and the EU is needed to deeply explain the differences in handling the outbreak in each region. The result shows that common enemies do not automatically reflect joint regional action. National interest is still challenging to consolidate at the regional, furthermore global level. Moreover, cultural differences between countries cannot be reduced quickly in global matters.  

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Defying the Uncertainty of the Global Political Economy Order Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Environmental Issue and Digital Diplomacy in the Contemporary International Rel Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Nationalism and the Current International Relations in Asia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Multilateral Governance and Global Civil Society Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Conflict and the Problem of Cooperation in International Relations Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue