cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Serpian
Contact Email
serpian@poliupg.ac.id
Phone
+6285241204400
Journal Mail Official
intek@poliupg.ac.id
Editorial Address
Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang Kampus 1 Gedung Administrasi Lantai II Jalan Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.10 Tamalanrea Makassar 90245
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
INTEK: Jurnal Penelitian
Published by Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang
ISSN : 23390700     EISSN : 26155427     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Computer Science & IT Engineering
INTEK is a journal managed by the Journal and Publication Development Unit of Ujung Pandang State Polytechnic, which is published twice a year, in April and October. The journal INTEK has also been indexed. The INTEK Journal accepts research scripts in the fields of technology and engineering such as: Electrical, Mechanical, Civil and Chemical Engineering.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020" : 14 Documents clear
Bearing Capacity Analysis of Spun Pile Foundation in Gas Engine for Electrical Power Plant Project of Selayar Mutiara, Indra
INTEK: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31963/intek.v7i2.2643

Abstract

Gas Engine for Electrical Power Plant Project of Selayar is a power plant which will be built in Selayar Regency. This plant uses gas and biodiesel as a fuel. The facilities needed in the power plant construction includes a Gas Engine, Service Water Tank and Biosolar Tank. This study aims to obtain the allowable bearing capacity of the prestressed spun pile foundation for the three buildings based on soil investigation data of SPT (Standard Penetration Test) at BH-1 (gas engine), BH-2 (service water tank) and BH-3 (biosolar tank). The Meyerhof formula is used for the calculation of ultimate bearing capacity analysis on prestressed spun piles with various diameters for each depth. Calculation of the allowable bearing capacity (Qa) of the foundation at a depth of 19 meters, using a spun pile with a diameter of 300 cm, obtained a Qa value of 94.17 tons at BH-1, 94.20 tons at BH-2, and 74.65 tons at BH-3. Using a spun pile with a diameter of 400 cm, the Qa values were 116.71 tons on BH-1, 117.64 tons on BH-2, and 91.92 tons on BH-3. Using a spun pile with a diameter of 500 cm, the Qa values were 168.67 tons on BH-1, 172.09 tons on BH-2, and 131.49 tons on BH-3. Meanwhile, the values of Qa obtained were 229.85 tons on BH-1, 236.66 tons on BH-2, and 177.79 tons on BH-3 with the use of a spun pile with a diameter of 600 cm.
Exergy Analysis of 1 x 135 MW Jeneponto Steam Power Plant Hamzah, Nur; Yunus, A.M Shiddiq; Al Fadiyah, Waqva Enno
INTEK: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31963/intek.v7i2.2697

Abstract

Exergy analysis is application of the second law thermodynamics which provides information about large exergy, exergy efficiency, destruction, and destruction efficiency in each component of PLTU so can be reference for improvement and optimization in an effort to reduce losses and increase efficiency. The exergy value obtained from calculating mass flowrate, enthalpy, ambient temperature, and entropy. The destruction value is obtained from difference between input exergy value and exergy output. The destruction exergy value from comparison between output exergy value to input exergy value, and destruction efficiency value from comparison of destruction value to total destruction value of PLTU components. The results showed that the largest exergy occurred in boilers, namely 778.225 MW in 2018, 788.824 MW in 2019, and 796.824 MW in 2020, lowest exergy value in CP was 0.160 MW in 2018, 0.176 MW in 2019, and 0.160 MW in 2020. The largest destruction occurred in boilers, namely 163.970 MW with destruction efficiency 79.242% in 2018, 179.450 MW with destruction efficiency 82.111% in 2019, and 199.637 MW with destruction efficiency 83.448% in 2020, lowest exergy destruction value at CP, namely 0.056 MW with destruction efficiency 0.027% in 2018, 0.059 MW with destruction efficiency 0.027% in 2019, and 0.056 MW with destruction efficiency 0.023% in 2020. The exergy efficiency occurred in HPH 2, amounting to 94.750% in 2018, 95.187 % in 2019, and 94.728% in 2020, while lowest of exergy efficiency was in LPH 1, namely 43.637 MW in 2018, 33.512 MW in 2019, and 38.764 MW in 2020.
Comparative Analysis of Solar Cell Efficiency between Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Sugianto, Sugianto
INTEK: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31963/intek.v7i2.2625

Abstract

The output power capacity of solar panels depends on the intensity of light radiation it receives, while the life time depends on the high and low temperatures experienced. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of light intensity on the output power and efficiency of solar panels. This study applies a direct measurement method using a monocrystalline type solar panel and a polycrystalline type with the same power capacity with a peak capacity of 50 Wp. The research was conducted indoors using lights as light sources by varying the light intensity in the range 2.21-331.01 W/m2 with a distance of 50 cm from the light source from the solar panel. The increase in temperature on the surface of the solar panel can also reduce the power capacity generated, and the monocrystalline type is more resistant to temperature increases than polycrystalline. The efficiency of the solar panel changes when given light with a certain energy, up to the highest intensity of 331.01 W/ m2, with the highest temperature that occurs resulting in an efficiency of 12.84% on the Monocrystalline Panel and 11.95% on the Polycrystalline Panel.
Corrosion Rate of Black Chromium Coating Result of Electroplating on Copper Hadi, Syamsul; Valeria, Sza Sya Monica; Adiwidodo, Satworo; Amrullah, Utsman Syah; Takwim, R.N. Akhsanu; Firmansyah, Hilmi Iman
INTEK: Jurnal Penelitian Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31963/intek.v7i2.2681

Abstract

The problem faced is that the white chromium coating has a low selling value or aesthetic value than the black chromium layer which is more in demand, especially by the younger generation who prioritizes aesthetics. The purpose of the corrosion test was to determine the corrosion resistance ability of the black chromium coating resulting from the electroplating process on the relationship between the solution temperature and the immersion time of copper in a corrosive solution. Corrosion test methods include literature studies, field observations, weighing specimens, immersing specimens in corrosive solutions, weighing specimens, calculating corrosion rates, and data analyzing. Corrosion test results show that the higher the temperature of the solution and the longer the immersion time, the smaller the corrosion rate for the lowest conditions at 30oC and a duration of 5 minutes with a corrosion rate of 0.2004 mm/year and the highest conditions at a temperature of 50oC and a duration of 9 minutes at a rate of corrosion of 0.0108 mm/year.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2025): April 2025 Vol 11 No 2 (2024): October 2024 Vol 11 No 1 (2024): April 2024 Vol 10 No 2 (2023): October 2023 Vol 10 No 1 (2023): April 2023 Vol 9 No 2 (2022): October 2022 Vol 9 No 1 (2022): April 2022 Vol 8 No 2 (2021): October 2021 Vol 8 No 1 (2021): April 2021 Vol 7 No 2 (2020): October 2020 Vol 7 No 1 (2020): In Press Vol 6 No 2 (2019): October 2019 Vol 6 No 1 (2019): April 2019 Vol 5 No 2 (2018): Oktober 2018 Vol 5 No 1 (2018): April 2018 Vol 4 No 2 (2017): Oktober 2017 Vol 4 No 1 (2017): April 2017 Vol 3 No 2 (2016): Oktober 2016 Vol 3 No 1 (2016): April 2016 More Issue