cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Tarjo
Contact Email
mulfaapfjurnal@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mulfaapfjurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Asia Pacific Fraud Journal
Published by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter
ISSN : 25028731     EISSN : 2502695X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences
ASIA PACIFIC FRAUD JOURNAL (APFJ) firstly published by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia Chapter in 2016. APFJ registered on CrossRef, then every article published di APFJ has Digital Object Identifier (DOI). APFJ published research and review articles. APFJ also published the articles from Call For Paper that managed by ACFE Indonesia Chapter. - Forensic Accounting - Fraud Prevention - Fraud Detection - Investigation - Crime - Criminalogy.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 281 Documents
 25   26   27   28   29 
Beyond the Numbers: How Digital Evidence Shapes Anti-Corruption Justice in Indonesia Wishnu Agung Baroto
Asia Pacific Fraud Journal Vol. 11 No. 1: 1st Edition (January-June 2026)
Publisher : Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21532/apfjournal.v11i1.485

Abstract

Digital evidence has become increasingly important in corruption investigations; however, its quality and utilization vary significantly across Indonesia’s judicial system. This study examines how digital evidence influences anti-corruption justice by analyzing institutional capacity, forensic quality, and regional disparities. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative analysis of 1,248 court decisions from 2010–2023 and qualitative document analysis, this study identifies patterns in digital evidence adoption and forensic procedures. The findings reveal a dual-track system in which corruption cases demonstrate substantially higher forensic compliance than other case categories, while significant disparities exist between Jakarta and regional courts. The study argues that legal frameworks alone are insufficient to ensure consistent digital evidence practices, as institutional capacity and resource distribution play critical roles. This research contributes by proposing a reform framework emphasizing tiered standards, regional forensic capacity development, specialized task forces, and procedural improvements.

Page 29 of 29 | Total Record : 281

 25   26   27   28   29 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1: 1st Edition (January-June 2026) Vol. 10 No. 2: 2nd Edition (July-December 2025) Vol. 10 No. 1: 1st Edition (January-June 2025) Vol. 9 No. 2: 2nd Edition (July-December 2024) Vol. 9 No. 1: 1st Edition (January-June 2024) Vol. 8 No. 1: Volume 8, No. 1st Edition (January-June 2023) Vol. 8 No. 2: 2nd Edition (July-December 2023) Vol 7, No 1: Volume 7, No. 1st Edition (January-June 2022) Vol 7, No 2: 2nd Edition (July-December 2022) Vol 6, No 2: Volume 6, No. 2nd Edition (July-December 2021) Vol 6, No 1: Volume 6, No. 1st Edition (January-June 2021) Vol 5, No 2: Volume 5, No. 2nd Edition (July-December 2020) Vol 5, No 1: Volume 5, No. 1st Edition (January-June 2020) Vol 4, No 2: Volume 4, No.2nd Edition (July-December 2019) Vol 4, No 1: Volume 4, No. 1st Edition (January-June 2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2018): Volume 3, No.2nd Edition (July-December 2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Volume 3, No.1st Edition (January-June 2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2017): Volume 2, No.2nd Edition (July - December 2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Volume 2, No.1st Edition (January-June 2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Volume 1, No.2nd Edition (July-December 2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Volume 1, No.1st Edition (January-June 2016) More Issue