cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
dentin
Contact Email
dentin.jtamfkg@ulm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
dentin.jtamfkg@ulm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Dentin
Published by Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
ISSN : 26140098     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Dentistry
Dentin [e-issn: 2614-0098] merupakan terbitan berkala ilmiah tugas akhir berbahasa Indonesia berisi artikel penelitian dan kajian literatur tentang kedokteran gigi. Kontributor Dentin adalah kalangan akademisi (dosen dan mahasiswa). Dikelola oleh Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat dan terbit 3 (tiga) kali setahun setiap April, Agustus dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7, No 2 (2023)" : 11 Documents clear
COMPARISON OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECT BETWEEN ULIN (Eusideroxylon zwageri) BARK EXTRACT AND Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% AGAINST Streptococcus sanguinis Marthia Eka Nurdila; I Wayan Arya Krishnawan Firdaus; Raden Harry Dharmawan Setyawardhana
Dentin Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/dentin.v7i2.9717

Abstract

Background: Gingivitis is caused by a build up of plaque bacteria, one of which is Streptococcus sanguinis. Streptococcus sanguinis act as an anchor for the attachment of oral organisms that colonize the surface of the teeth, forming plaque so that it becomes the development of gingivitis. Currently, many natural ingredients, as alternatives, have antibacterial effects. One of which is Eusideroxylon zwageri, because it contains flavonoids, tannins, phenolics, saponins, alkaloids, and terpenoids. Purpose: to compare the inhibitory effect between ulin bark extract and Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% against Streptococcus sanguinis. Method: True experimental research with post test only with control group design using ulin bark extract concentrations of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% and Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% as the K(+). The maceration method was used to extract ulin bark while the inhibitory test was using the diffusion method with 6 treatment groups and 4 replications, so that there were 24 samples. All treatment groups were incubated 24 hours at 37oC then measurement of inhibition zones was using callipers. Results: The results of the test showed that ulin bark extract concentrations of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%, and Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% obtained an average inhibition zone with diameter of 7.18 mm, 9.06 mm, 11.08 mm, 13 mm, 15.09 mm, and 18.14 mm. Analysis of One Way ANOVA and Post Hoc Games-Howell data showed a significant difference between treatment groups. Conclusion: Ulin bark extract can inhibit the growth of Streptococcus sanguinis but has not been able to equal to Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2%. Keywords: Chlorhexidine gluconate 0,2%, gingivitis, inhibitory activity, ulin bark extract, Streptococcus sanguinis.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 3 (2025) Vol 9, No 2 (2025) Vol 9, No 1 (2025) Vol 8, No 3 (2024) Vol 8, No 2 (2024) Vol 8, No 1 (2024) Vol 7, No 3 (2023) Vol 7, No 2 (2023) Vol 7, No 1 (2023) Vol 6, No 3 (2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 1 (2022) Vol 5, No 3 (2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol 5, No 1 (2021) Vol 4, No 3 (2020) Vol 4, No 2 (2020) Vol 4, No 1 (2020) Vol 3, No 3 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue