cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Ghiyats Ristiana
Contact Email
kanghiyats@gmail.com
Phone
+6287764329708
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING is published by IKIP Siliwangi publishes original research or theoretical papers about teaching and learning in mathematics education study program on current science issues, namely: 1. Mathematics educator in elementary, secondary and high school level 2. Mathematics observers and researchers 3. Educational decisions maker on the regional and national level
Location
Kota cimahi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING
Published by STKIP Siliwangi Bandung
ISSN : 26214733     EISSN : 26214741     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING is published by IKIP Siliwangi publishes original research or theoretical papers about teaching and learning in mathematics education study program on current science issues, namely: 1. Mathematics educator in elementary, secondary and high school level 2. Mathematics observers and researchers 3. Educational decisions maker on the regional and national level
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 314 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
Mathematical Representation Abilities in Bruner’s Representation Stages: A Phenomenological Study of High School Students Puspita Helena; Krisna Satrio Perbowo
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2026
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v9i2.31378

Abstract

Mathematical representation ability is important in helping students understand mathematical concepts and solve problems meaningfully. However, studies on mathematical representation abilities through Bruner’s stages of representation remain limited, while students still experience difficulties in connecting various forms of representation. This study aims to describe the characteristics of students' mathematical representation abilities at each stage of Jerome Bruner’s development. The study employed a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach involving 104 tenth-grade high school students in Indonesia selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through mathematical representation tests, Focus Group Discussions (FGD), and non-systematic observation sheets, then analyzed thematically, with themes derived entirely from students’ responses to address the research questions. The results indicate that students' mathematical representation abilities vary across Bruner’s stages of representation. In the enactive stage, students use object manipulation to understand problems, although not optimally. In the iconic stage, students use visual representations such as tables, figures, and diagrams, but some are still unsystematic and do not fully reflect the problem structure. At the symbolic stage, students are able to construct mathematical models and apply algebraic procedures, although errors in modeling, method application, and calculation are still found. In addition, students’ verbal representation abilities remain limited, as indicated by their difficulty in drawing conclusions that connect results to the problem context. These findings indicate that mastery of the enactive and iconic stages contributes to students’ success in reaching symbolic representation and may serve as a basis for developing more meaningful mathematics learning strategies.
Mathematics Engagement among Secondary Student: A Comparative Study based on Socioeconomic Status Jay Singh; Michael Tarance Suraj; Sangeeta Chauhan
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2026
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v9i2.31402

Abstract

Engagement of students in mathematics is an important determinant which affects academic success as well as the motivation of students in secondary schools. On the other hand, there is inadequate information about the role played by socio-demographic variables like social category and parental occupation in determining student engagement. The objective of this research was to study the differences between social categories and parental occupation on student engagement in mathematics among secondary school students. This research was undertaken using quantitative methodology with a descriptive survey research design. The sample consisted of 211 students of class IX who were taken from two UP Board schools located in Lucknow district. The selection of participants was made through purposive sampling method. The data was collected from the subjects through the tool “Student Engagement in Mathematics Scale” (Perception Scale) designed by Dr. Gurpreet Kaur & Dr. Ram Mehar. Analysis of data was carried out using non-parametric statistical methods, more specifically, Mann–Whitney U test. The result showed that no significant difference was seen in cognitive and behavioral engagement based on social category, however, a significant difference was seen in affective engagement with students of reserved social category having higher engagement. Moreover, there was no observed difference among the dimensions of engagement when categorized according to the job status of parents. In summary, social category and the jobs that the parents have cannot influence engagement except for affective engagement. As a result, creating positive emotions is crucial in enhancing engagement among students.
Developing Mathematical Reasoning Skills through Classroom Questions: A Framework based on Problem-Chain Teaching Wan Yan
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2026
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v9i2.31470

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning is a core competency in compulsory education mathematics curricula worldwide, yet classroom practices frequently fall short in systematically cultivating this ability. Students often rely on mechanical problem-solving techniques rather than engaging in sustained reasoning processes. This study addresses the critical research gap concerning how problem-chain teaching can serve as an effective instructional paradigm for developing students' mathematical reasoning skills. Using a conceptual synthesis methodology that integrates domestic and international literature on mathematics pedagogy, classroom questioning, and reasoning development, this paper analyzes the mechanisms through which classroom questioning supports reasoning and proposes three differentiated pathways: problem-chain design strategies (analogical, inductive, and deductive chains), optimization of oral questioning types, and organization of reasoning discourse through student work samples. The framework provides mathematics teachers with systematic, operable strategies that align with curriculum standards and support progressive reasoning development from primary through secondary levels. Key contributions include: (1) the cross-cultural integration of Eastern and Western research traditions on reasoning and questioning; (2) a three-level reasoning progression model that guides differentiated problem-chain and questioning design; and (3) actionable teaching recommendations grounded in empirical evidence from classroom studies conducted in diverse educational contexts (Kapur, 2016; Brodie, 2010).
Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability based on Their Adversity Quotient Nova Nurhanifah; Suhendra; Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2026
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v9i2.32897

Abstract

Mathematical critical thinking is a fundamental competency required to navigate complex problem-solving in the 21st century. However, empirical observations indicate that students often struggle with analytical reasoning, a deficiency potentially influenced by non-cognitive factors such as Adversity Quotient (AQ). This study aims to analyze the mathematical critical thinking profiles of Grade XII students in Garut Regency, West Java, Indonesia, based on their AQ levels. This research employs a qualitative descriptive design. The subjects were selected via purposive sampling and categorized into three distinct groups based on Stoltz’s framework: Quitters, Campers, and Climbers. Ten students were selected from each AQ category.Data were collected through AQ questionnaires, mathematical critical thinking tests, and semi-structured interviews. Data validity was established using time triangulation, followed by data reduction, display, and verification for analysis. The findings reveal a hierarchical consistency between AQ levels and critical thinking ability. Students in the Quitter group were limited to elementary clarification; Campers demonstrated intermediate capabilities but struggled with advanced evaluation; while Climbersmastered all written indicators but faced challenges in verbally articulating their mathematical reasoning.  

Page 32 of 32 | Total Record : 314

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2026 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): VOLUME 9 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2026 Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2025 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2025 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2024 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2023 Vol 6, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2023 Vol 5, No 4 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2022 Vol 4, No 4 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2021 Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2020 Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2019 Vol 1, No 4 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Volume 1 Number 1, March 2018 More Issue